The paper investigates the capabilities of different CFD modelling approaches in reproducing operating conditions relevant for Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors technologies. The selected benchmark is the NACIE-UP facility wire-wrapped fuel bundle using Lead-Bismuth Eutectic (LBE) as coolant: the predictions are compared to the experimental data collected for several operating conditions considered in the frame of two distinct experimental campaigns. Four different modelling approaches have been adopted in this work to model the NACIE-UP Fuel Pin Simulator: Bare, Detailed, Solid-Wire and the Porous-Wire Rod Bundle model. A model-tomodel comparison is performed to understand the benefits, limitations, and accuracy of using different modelling approaches for representing wrapped wires fuel bundles. Furthermore, integrating NACIE-UP benchmark experimental data into the comparative analysis reinforce the validation process of the adopted modelling approaches.

A comparative analysis of detailed and reduced CFD approaches to model wire-wrapped fuel bundles for LMFBRs applications

Galleni, F.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Forgione, N.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Pucciarelli, A.
Writing – Review & Editing
2025-01-01

Abstract

The paper investigates the capabilities of different CFD modelling approaches in reproducing operating conditions relevant for Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors technologies. The selected benchmark is the NACIE-UP facility wire-wrapped fuel bundle using Lead-Bismuth Eutectic (LBE) as coolant: the predictions are compared to the experimental data collected for several operating conditions considered in the frame of two distinct experimental campaigns. Four different modelling approaches have been adopted in this work to model the NACIE-UP Fuel Pin Simulator: Bare, Detailed, Solid-Wire and the Porous-Wire Rod Bundle model. A model-tomodel comparison is performed to understand the benefits, limitations, and accuracy of using different modelling approaches for representing wrapped wires fuel bundles. Furthermore, integrating NACIE-UP benchmark experimental data into the comparative analysis reinforce the validation process of the adopted modelling approaches.
2025
Halim, O.; Galleni, F.; Forgione, N.; Di Piazza, I.; Pucciarelli, A.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1274453
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact