Bridges positioned near riverbeds experience complex interactions between flow dynamics and structural geometry, significantly affecting hydrodynamic loading and stability. This study analyzes the effect of deck proximity to the bed on pressure distribution and hydrodynamic loading, including drag and lift forces. Experimental tests were conducted in a rectangular channel using a scaled bridge deck model, varying deck positions, flow conditions, and upstream–downstream water depth levels. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, for the first time, a comparative analysis of hydrodynamic loads on bridge decks was conducted using both rigid and deformable granular beds. Pressure distributions on the front, rear, and bottom faces of the deck were measured using transducers sensors. Our findings corroborate that changes in Reynolds number have minimal impact on the deck drag and lift coefficients, under identical submergence conditions, whereas both coefficients decrease with the Froude number for both bed types. More importantly, the analysis of experimental evidence unveiled some interesting aspects pertaining to the physics of the phenomenon, allowing us to provide the following, unprecedented results: (1) lift and drag coefficients significantly decrease with proximity, exhibiting much higher values than those reported in the literature for larger clearance; (2) under identical hydraulic conditions (both upstream and downstream of the deck), drag and lift coefficients are significantly amplified by the presence of rigid beds compared to granular beds; and (3) the scour evolution alters the effective deck proximity, resulting in time-dependent hydrodynamic loads acting on the deck.

Hydrodynamic Loads on Rectangular Bridge Decks at Very Low Proximity in Fixed and Movable Beds

Palermo M.
Primo
;
Kumar A.
Secondo
;
Wei H.
Penultimo
;
Pagliara S.
Ultimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Bridges positioned near riverbeds experience complex interactions between flow dynamics and structural geometry, significantly affecting hydrodynamic loading and stability. This study analyzes the effect of deck proximity to the bed on pressure distribution and hydrodynamic loading, including drag and lift forces. Experimental tests were conducted in a rectangular channel using a scaled bridge deck model, varying deck positions, flow conditions, and upstream–downstream water depth levels. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, for the first time, a comparative analysis of hydrodynamic loads on bridge decks was conducted using both rigid and deformable granular beds. Pressure distributions on the front, rear, and bottom faces of the deck were measured using transducers sensors. Our findings corroborate that changes in Reynolds number have minimal impact on the deck drag and lift coefficients, under identical submergence conditions, whereas both coefficients decrease with the Froude number for both bed types. More importantly, the analysis of experimental evidence unveiled some interesting aspects pertaining to the physics of the phenomenon, allowing us to provide the following, unprecedented results: (1) lift and drag coefficients significantly decrease with proximity, exhibiting much higher values than those reported in the literature for larger clearance; (2) under identical hydraulic conditions (both upstream and downstream of the deck), drag and lift coefficients are significantly amplified by the presence of rigid beds compared to granular beds; and (3) the scour evolution alters the effective deck proximity, resulting in time-dependent hydrodynamic loads acting on the deck.
2025
Palermo, M.; Kumar, A.; Wei, H.; Pagliara, S.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1306548
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact