Starting from the analysis of the institutional architecture of the first School of Corporative Sciences among those created by the fascist regime, established at the University of Pisa in 1928, the contribution, in the first part, examines some aspects of the scientific proposal of the institution, especially on the side of the economic disciplines taught there. In addition to the goal of training personnel who were to work in corporate structures, until 1935 the school contributed to the development of a “science of corporatism” that went beyond the postulates of “pure” economics. In the second half of the 1930s, following the transition of the leadership from Giuseppe Bottai to Widar Cesarini Sforza, a long phase of crisis began for the school, punctually recorded by the conspicuous decline in membership. In the second part political economy teachings are examined as symbols of the failure of corporatism from a theoretical point of view. Guido Sensini and Ugo Spirito were imparting teachings that could not have been more different. The former based on marginalist postulates and the acceptance of corporations as a lesser evil. The second on the rejection of homo oeconomicus and the exaltation of corporatism as overcoming liberalism and communism.

Economic Science and Corporatism: The School of Corporatist Sciences of Pisa

Fabrizio Bientinesi;Marco Cini
2023-01-01

Abstract

Starting from the analysis of the institutional architecture of the first School of Corporative Sciences among those created by the fascist regime, established at the University of Pisa in 1928, the contribution, in the first part, examines some aspects of the scientific proposal of the institution, especially on the side of the economic disciplines taught there. In addition to the goal of training personnel who were to work in corporate structures, until 1935 the school contributed to the development of a “science of corporatism” that went beyond the postulates of “pure” economics. In the second half of the 1930s, following the transition of the leadership from Giuseppe Bottai to Widar Cesarini Sforza, a long phase of crisis began for the school, punctually recorded by the conspicuous decline in membership. In the second part political economy teachings are examined as symbols of the failure of corporatism from a theoretical point of view. Guido Sensini and Ugo Spirito were imparting teachings that could not have been more different. The former based on marginalist postulates and the acceptance of corporations as a lesser evil. The second on the rejection of homo oeconomicus and the exaltation of corporatism as overcoming liberalism and communism.
2023
Bientinesi, Fabrizio; Cini, Marco
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1314407
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact