Clustering techniques are the standard to identify representative days of annual trends of energy demand, prices and climatic conditions in Multi-Energy Systems (MES) design. However, the literature lacks guidelines for clustering techniques leading to the ‘best’ design solution of a MES, usually neglecting a complete testing phase on multi-year datasets. This paper presents MESCO, a MES Clustering-Optimization framework to (1) generate representative days using different clustering algorithms (k-means, substitution, k-medoids) and extreme days criteria (null, replacing, adding, iterative); (2) validate the clustering-based design solutions on a ‘past’ dataset (2010-2018) and assess their robustness against two ‘future’ scenarios (Covid-19 pandemic, 2019-2020; Russia-Ukraine war, 2021-2022). Kmeans−iterative clustering-based solutions with 7–9 representative days lead to the lowest relative error in total cost compared to perfect knowledge design solutions based on full time series, with errors of +4% and +25% for 2019-2020 and 2021-2022 scenarios, respectively. While results in other cases may differ, the application of the proposed general framework remains effective in evaluating the accuracy of different clustering algorithms and extreme day criteria in MES design.

MESCO: a Clustering framework for the design Optimization of future Multi-Energy Systems

Alessandro Pampado;Davide Fioriti;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Clustering techniques are the standard to identify representative days of annual trends of energy demand, prices and climatic conditions in Multi-Energy Systems (MES) design. However, the literature lacks guidelines for clustering techniques leading to the ‘best’ design solution of a MES, usually neglecting a complete testing phase on multi-year datasets. This paper presents MESCO, a MES Clustering-Optimization framework to (1) generate representative days using different clustering algorithms (k-means, substitution, k-medoids) and extreme days criteria (null, replacing, adding, iterative); (2) validate the clustering-based design solutions on a ‘past’ dataset (2010-2018) and assess their robustness against two ‘future’ scenarios (Covid-19 pandemic, 2019-2020; Russia-Ukraine war, 2021-2022). Kmeans−iterative clustering-based solutions with 7–9 representative days lead to the lowest relative error in total cost compared to perfect knowledge design solutions based on full time series, with errors of +4% and +25% for 2019-2020 and 2021-2022 scenarios, respectively. While results in other cases may differ, the application of the proposed general framework remains effective in evaluating the accuracy of different clustering algorithms and extreme day criteria in MES design.
2025
Pampado, Alessandro; Volpato, Gabriele; Fioriti, Davide; Lazzaretto, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1320367
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact