Three LLMs - ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Advanced - were evaluated on COPD questions from the GOLD recommendations. Sixty-one pulmonologists from 6 continents rated 90 AI responses for completeness, accuracy, terminology, accessibility, and safety. Gemini outperformed in completeness, Claude in accuracy and terminology, with no differences in accessibility or safety. While promising, clinical use requires caution and further validation to ensure safe, accurate patient education.

Valutazione comparativa di modelli linguistici di grandi dimensioni per il supporto all’educazione sanitaria del paziente con BPCO: uno studio pneumologico internazionale delle risposte generate da ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet e Gemini 1.5 Advanced

Marchi, Guido
;
Gambini, Giulia;Guglielmi, Giacomo;Pistelli, Francesco;Carrozzi, Laura
2025-01-01

Abstract

Three LLMs - ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Advanced - were evaluated on COPD questions from the GOLD recommendations. Sixty-one pulmonologists from 6 continents rated 90 AI responses for completeness, accuracy, terminology, accessibility, and safety. Gemini outperformed in completeness, Claude in accuracy and terminology, with no differences in accessibility or safety. While promising, clinical use requires caution and further validation to ensure safe, accurate patient education.
2025
Marchi, Guido; Gambini, Giulia; Guglielmi, Giacomo; Pistelli, Francesco; Carrozzi, Laura
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1326528
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact