In my book Identità e continuità dello Stato, I have attempted to point out the juridical meaning for the two notions referred to in the title. They must be conceptually distinguished from the notion of succession between States, showing that they are not simply its negative counterpart. However, this is only possible, in my view, by going beyond the ordinary epistemological principles that explain the nature and functioning of the State. Consequently, a philosophy of the State must be at the same time a philosophy in the classical sense; and to develop it, Hauriou’s doctrine is a firmer support than Kelsen’s

Il Senso dello Stato e i suoi significati. Una risposta ai miei lettori

Giorgio Ridolfi
2025-01-01

Abstract

In my book Identità e continuità dello Stato, I have attempted to point out the juridical meaning for the two notions referred to in the title. They must be conceptually distinguished from the notion of succession between States, showing that they are not simply its negative counterpart. However, this is only possible, in my view, by going beyond the ordinary epistemological principles that explain the nature and functioning of the State. Consequently, a philosophy of the State must be at the same time a philosophy in the classical sense; and to develop it, Hauriou’s doctrine is a firmer support than Kelsen’s
2025
Ridolfi, Giorgio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1336791
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact