Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are major causes of vision loss in diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been explored as an adjunctive treatment due to its potential to enhance oxygenation, reduce inflammation, and lower oxidative stress in retinal tissues. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed HBOT’s efficacy in improving best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Methods: A comprehensive search across major databases up to May 2025 identified five eligible studies involving 463 eyes. Results: Pooled data showed HBOT significantly improved BCVA (mean difference—0.05 LogMAR; 95% CI: −0.09 to −0.01; p < 0.05) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), suggesting consistent functional benefit. However, sensitivity analysis revealed this effect was fragile, losing significance when the largest study was excluded. For CMT, HBOT was associated with a significant reduction (−75.21 (95% CI −90.04 to −60.38; p < 0.05), though heterogeneity was high (I2 = 62%), likely due to differences in patient profiles and treatment combinations. Conclusions: While HBOT shows potential in managing DR and DME, further robust randomized trials are needed to validate its clinical utility and define optimal treatment protocols

Efficacy of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Enrico Moccia
Co-primo
;
Vincenzo Rizzuto
Co-primo
;
Marco Laurino;Giuseppe Covello
Ultimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are major causes of vision loss in diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been explored as an adjunctive treatment due to its potential to enhance oxygenation, reduce inflammation, and lower oxidative stress in retinal tissues. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed HBOT’s efficacy in improving best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Methods: A comprehensive search across major databases up to May 2025 identified five eligible studies involving 463 eyes. Results: Pooled data showed HBOT significantly improved BCVA (mean difference—0.05 LogMAR; 95% CI: −0.09 to −0.01; p < 0.05) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), suggesting consistent functional benefit. However, sensitivity analysis revealed this effect was fragile, losing significance when the largest study was excluded. For CMT, HBOT was associated with a significant reduction (−75.21 (95% CI −90.04 to −60.38; p < 0.05), though heterogeneity was high (I2 = 62%), likely due to differences in patient profiles and treatment combinations. Conclusions: While HBOT shows potential in managing DR and DME, further robust randomized trials are needed to validate its clinical utility and define optimal treatment protocols
2025
Moccia, Enrico; Rizzuto, Vincenzo; Longobardi, Pasquale; Ferrone, Anita; Laurino, Marco; Zemītis, Artūrs; Covello, Giuseppe
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1337979
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact