Introduction: Suicide represents an important public health concern since it leads to more annual deaths globally than violence, war and natural disasters combined. During this pandemic year, the phenomenon acquires even greater importance especially in the categories at risk, such as health care workers (HCWs). This review aims to analyze literature evidence regarding health care providers' suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide commitment during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: International databases and digital worldwide media reports were screened between March 2020 to March 2021. The authors conducted a systematic review and described evidence using a narrative approach with some focus points based on the PICO framework. Inclusion or exclusion of literature is done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Results: The review showed range of SI varied from 4% to 8% and the main risk factors seemed to be loneliness, not having children and personal history of mental disorders. Conclusion: SI, and in worst cases suicide commitment, seem mental health outcomes not to be underestimated, especially in an emergency that is protracting. They require monitoring by health surveillance systems with a goal of prevention and support.
Suicidal ideation and suicide commitment in Health Care Workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature
Perretta S.;Foddis R.;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Introduction: Suicide represents an important public health concern since it leads to more annual deaths globally than violence, war and natural disasters combined. During this pandemic year, the phenomenon acquires even greater importance especially in the categories at risk, such as health care workers (HCWs). This review aims to analyze literature evidence regarding health care providers' suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide commitment during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: International databases and digital worldwide media reports were screened between March 2020 to March 2021. The authors conducted a systematic review and described evidence using a narrative approach with some focus points based on the PICO framework. Inclusion or exclusion of literature is done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Results: The review showed range of SI varied from 4% to 8% and the main risk factors seemed to be loneliness, not having children and personal history of mental disorders. Conclusion: SI, and in worst cases suicide commitment, seem mental health outcomes not to be underestimated, especially in an emergency that is protracting. They require monitoring by health surveillance systems with a goal of prevention and support.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


