This article traces the historical and conceptual trajectory of Gestaltungs- recht (discretionary right) in German and Italian civil law doctrine, from its emergence in nineteenth-century Pandectist scholarship to its gradual exhaustion in contemporary debates. The theory of discretionary rights is analyzed as a chapter within the broader theory of subjective rights and in- scribed in the public/private dichotomy as an instrument for rationalizing the relationship between civil society and the State. Through comparison with Hohfeld’s analysis of fundamental legal concepts in the Common Law tradi- tion, the Author highlights the limitations of the traditional approach based on the right/duty opposition and proposes a more nuanced perspective for analyzing legal positions. The second part of the essay applies this perspective to controversial issues in contemporary private law: abuse of rights, therapeu- tic self-determination and end-of-life decisions, ius variandi in asymmetric contracts, and warranty in sales. The analysis demonstrates how abandoning traditional schematism allows for a better understanding of the complexity of private relations beyond the paradigm of subjective rights.

Tra pubblico e privato. Il diritto potestativo dopo la “grande dicotomia”

Calderai, Valentina
2025-01-01

Abstract

This article traces the historical and conceptual trajectory of Gestaltungs- recht (discretionary right) in German and Italian civil law doctrine, from its emergence in nineteenth-century Pandectist scholarship to its gradual exhaustion in contemporary debates. The theory of discretionary rights is analyzed as a chapter within the broader theory of subjective rights and in- scribed in the public/private dichotomy as an instrument for rationalizing the relationship between civil society and the State. Through comparison with Hohfeld’s analysis of fundamental legal concepts in the Common Law tradi- tion, the Author highlights the limitations of the traditional approach based on the right/duty opposition and proposes a more nuanced perspective for analyzing legal positions. The second part of the essay applies this perspective to controversial issues in contemporary private law: abuse of rights, therapeu- tic self-determination and end-of-life decisions, ius variandi in asymmetric contracts, and warranty in sales. The analysis demonstrates how abandoning traditional schematism allows for a better understanding of the complexity of private relations beyond the paradigm of subjective rights.
2025
Calderai, Valentina
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1340947
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact