Grothendieck gave two forms of his “main conjecture of anabelian geometry”, namely the section conjecture and the hom conjecture. He stated that these two forms are equivalent and that if they hold for hyperbolic curves, then they hold for elementary anabelian varieties too. We state a stronger form of Grothendieck’s conjecture (equivalent in the case of curves) and prove that Grothendieck’s statements hold for our form of the conjecture. We work with DM stacks, rather than schemes. If X is a DM stack over k ⊆ ℂ, we prove that whether X satisfies the conjecture or not depends only on Xℂ. We prove that the section conjecture for hyperbolic orbicurves stated by Borne and Emsalem follows from the conjecture for hyperbolic curves.

Some implications between Grothendieck’s anabelian conjectures

Bresciani G.
2021-01-01

Abstract

Grothendieck gave two forms of his “main conjecture of anabelian geometry”, namely the section conjecture and the hom conjecture. He stated that these two forms are equivalent and that if they hold for hyperbolic curves, then they hold for elementary anabelian varieties too. We state a stronger form of Grothendieck’s conjecture (equivalent in the case of curves) and prove that Grothendieck’s statements hold for our form of the conjecture. We work with DM stacks, rather than schemes. If X is a DM stack over k ⊆ ℂ, we prove that whether X satisfies the conjecture or not depends only on Xℂ. We prove that the section conjecture for hyperbolic orbicurves stated by Borne and Emsalem follows from the conjecture for hyperbolic curves.
2021
Bresciani, G.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1343595
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact