This article examines Stanley Williams and Fen Montaigne’s Surviving Galeras (2001) as a memoir of science, trauma, and volcanic catastrophe centred on the deadly 1993 eruption of Galeras in Colombia. Combining personal testimony with scientific explanation, the text explores the psychological and ethical tensions of volcanology as a discipline suspended between knowledge and uncertainty. The article argues that the memoir represents the volcano as a living, unpredictable force that resists human control and exposes the limits of scientific certainty. Through personifications and metaphors of monstrosity and embodiment, Galeras emerges as an active geological presence capable of deceiving and overwhelming those who attempt to study it. The volcanologist is portrayed as a paradoxical figure: both humanitarian scientist and risk-taker, driven by fascination with destructive natural forces. Ultimately, Surviving Galeras presents catastrophe as an epistemological crisis that challenges anthropocentric confidence in prediction and mastery. By foregrounding the fragility of scientific authority, the failures of risk communication, and the coexistence of scientific and Indigenous understandings of the volcano, the memoir calls for a more humble and relational approach to the nonhuman world.
SURVIVING GALERAS by Stanley Williams and Fen Montaigne
Valerie Tosi
Primo
2026-01-01
Abstract
This article examines Stanley Williams and Fen Montaigne’s Surviving Galeras (2001) as a memoir of science, trauma, and volcanic catastrophe centred on the deadly 1993 eruption of Galeras in Colombia. Combining personal testimony with scientific explanation, the text explores the psychological and ethical tensions of volcanology as a discipline suspended between knowledge and uncertainty. The article argues that the memoir represents the volcano as a living, unpredictable force that resists human control and exposes the limits of scientific certainty. Through personifications and metaphors of monstrosity and embodiment, Galeras emerges as an active geological presence capable of deceiving and overwhelming those who attempt to study it. The volcanologist is portrayed as a paradoxical figure: both humanitarian scientist and risk-taker, driven by fascination with destructive natural forces. Ultimately, Surviving Galeras presents catastrophe as an epistemological crisis that challenges anthropocentric confidence in prediction and mastery. By foregrounding the fragility of scientific authority, the failures of risk communication, and the coexistence of scientific and Indigenous understandings of the volcano, the memoir calls for a more humble and relational approach to the nonhuman world.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


