Compared to the flourishing of studies on the artistic expression of Italian feminism, little has yet been done regarding the concurrent emergence of the homosexual political subject. Yet the two movements were parallel in many respects: chronologically; in their challenge to patriarchy; and in their collective practices of political thought formation. This essay proposes to bring together two significant artistic works from both movements in a single perspective, emphasizing the affinities in their extraction of two "unexpected subjects" within patriarchal society: Towards New Expression (1974) by Suzanne Santoro, and Madame Pontormo: primo contributo per una storia dell’arte dal rimosso omosessuale (1977) by Corrado Levi. Their roots lie in similar practices of consciousness-raising regarding the sexualized body and its eroticism. On this basis, they helped define the Italian feminist and homosexual subjects through a political appropriation of art history, casting retrospective glances not to venerate the great masters but to rediscover within them ancient, censored traces of "polymorphous" erotic pleasure—and thus something other than the heterosexual reproductive model. Both sketched out eccentric counter-narratives to academic art history, unconcerned with philology and historicism, yet engaged in the mission of transgressing the symbolic order and investigating historical alterities, finding in them a sense of existential and political belonging.
Rispetto al fiorire di studi sull’espressione artistica del femminismo italiano, ancora poco è stato fatto per il coevo avvento del soggetto politico omosessuale. Eppure, i due movimenti sono stati paralleli sotto molti aspetti: cronologico; nella contestazione del patriarcato; nelle pratiche collettive di elaborazione del pensiero politico. Il saggio abbraccia in un unico sguardo due testi artistici significativi per entrambi i movimenti, sottolineando le affinità nell’estrarre due “soggetti imprevisti” nella società patriarcale: Per una espressione nuova (1974), di Suzanne Santoro, e Madame Pontormo: primo contributo per una storia dell’arte dal rimosso omosessuale (1977), di Corrado Levi. Le radici affondano in simili pratiche di autocoscienza del corpo sessuato e del suo erotismo. A partire da ciò, essi contribuirono a definire i soggetti femminista e omosessuale italiani attraverso un’investitura politica della storia dell’arte, gettando sguardi retrospettivi non per venerazione dei grandi maestri ma per riscoprirvi antiche tracce, censurate, di godimento erotico “polimorfo”, e dunque altro rispetto al modello riproduttivo eterosessuale. Entrambi abbozzarono contro-narrazioni eccentriche rispetto alla storia dell’arte accademica, noncuranti della filologia e dello storicismo, ma ingaggiate nella missione di trasgredire l’ordine simbolico e indagare alterità storiche, trovando in esse un senso di appartenenza esistenziale e politica.
Nuove espressioni, diverse tradizioni nella storia dell’arte: Suzanne Santoro e Corrado Levi
Cortesini, Sergio
2025-01-01
Abstract
Compared to the flourishing of studies on the artistic expression of Italian feminism, little has yet been done regarding the concurrent emergence of the homosexual political subject. Yet the two movements were parallel in many respects: chronologically; in their challenge to patriarchy; and in their collective practices of political thought formation. This essay proposes to bring together two significant artistic works from both movements in a single perspective, emphasizing the affinities in their extraction of two "unexpected subjects" within patriarchal society: Towards New Expression (1974) by Suzanne Santoro, and Madame Pontormo: primo contributo per una storia dell’arte dal rimosso omosessuale (1977) by Corrado Levi. Their roots lie in similar practices of consciousness-raising regarding the sexualized body and its eroticism. On this basis, they helped define the Italian feminist and homosexual subjects through a political appropriation of art history, casting retrospective glances not to venerate the great masters but to rediscover within them ancient, censored traces of "polymorphous" erotic pleasure—and thus something other than the heterosexual reproductive model. Both sketched out eccentric counter-narratives to academic art history, unconcerned with philology and historicism, yet engaged in the mission of transgressing the symbolic order and investigating historical alterities, finding in them a sense of existential and political belonging.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


