The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new ethical dilemmas and emotional responses, yet little research has examined users’ social emotions such as shame, guilt, and impostor syndrome. This article presents the SAG-AI (Shame and Guilt related to AI tools) scale, a 9-item psychometric instrument developed to measure these emotions in AI tool usage. Two cross-sectional studies confirmed a three-factor structure: AI Shame, AI Guilt, and AI Impostor syndrome, with strong internal reliability (α ≥ 0.75). The scale demonstrates measurement invariance across genders and predicts AI tool use frequency: guilt and impostor feelings are negatively associated, while shame is positively associated. Convergent and divergent validity were also supported. Emotional responses to AI appear to shape user experience and adoption, particularly in education and knowledge work. The SAG-AI scale offers a novel way to assess affective dimensions of AI–human interaction, informing ethical design, AI literacy, and responsible integration of AI in society.
Emotional Responses to AI Use: Development of the SAG-AI Scale for Shame and Guilt
Cipriani, EnricoPrimo
;Menicucci, Danilo;Greco, Alberto;
2026-01-01
Abstract
The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new ethical dilemmas and emotional responses, yet little research has examined users’ social emotions such as shame, guilt, and impostor syndrome. This article presents the SAG-AI (Shame and Guilt related to AI tools) scale, a 9-item psychometric instrument developed to measure these emotions in AI tool usage. Two cross-sectional studies confirmed a three-factor structure: AI Shame, AI Guilt, and AI Impostor syndrome, with strong internal reliability (α ≥ 0.75). The scale demonstrates measurement invariance across genders and predicts AI tool use frequency: guilt and impostor feelings are negatively associated, while shame is positively associated. Convergent and divergent validity were also supported. Emotional responses to AI appear to shape user experience and adoption, particularly in education and knowledge work. The SAG-AI scale offers a novel way to assess affective dimensions of AI–human interaction, informing ethical design, AI literacy, and responsible integration of AI in society.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


