Full-waveform inversion (FWI) has become a cornerstone for high-resolution seismic imaging, yet it remains computationally demanding and sensitive to initial model assumptions and noise. Recent advances have shown that representing the subsurface model, using implicit neural representations (INRs), can provide compact, continuous and differentiable parameterizations that improve convergence and reduce overfitting. In this study, we extend the INR-based FWI framework to the elastic regime, with a focus on near-surface applications and the inversion of surface waves. In particular, we performed the inversion of both synthetic and field surface wave datasets. Our method leverages Deepwave for elastic wave simulation and gradient computation via automatic differentiation. In the synthetic test, we compare the performance obtained using different INR architectures to find the optimal configuration. For the field dataset inversion instead, we compare our results with those obtained using a standard deterministic FWI approach, highlighting its superior robustness with respect to initialization.

Implicit Neural Representation for Elastic Full-Waveform Inversion

Berti Sean
;
Aleardi M.;Stucchi E.
2026-01-01

Abstract

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) has become a cornerstone for high-resolution seismic imaging, yet it remains computationally demanding and sensitive to initial model assumptions and noise. Recent advances have shown that representing the subsurface model, using implicit neural representations (INRs), can provide compact, continuous and differentiable parameterizations that improve convergence and reduce overfitting. In this study, we extend the INR-based FWI framework to the elastic regime, with a focus on near-surface applications and the inversion of surface waves. In particular, we performed the inversion of both synthetic and field surface wave datasets. Our method leverages Deepwave for elastic wave simulation and gradient computation via automatic differentiation. In the synthetic test, we compare the performance obtained using different INR architectures to find the optimal configuration. For the field dataset inversion instead, we compare our results with those obtained using a standard deterministic FWI approach, highlighting its superior robustness with respect to initialization.
2026
Berti, Sean; Aleardi, M.; Stucchi, E.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1359260
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact