Although data rest at the core of archaeology, systematic data sharing remains relatively limited within the discipline, especially when compared to other fields. After defining the key components and principles underlying data sharing, this contribution discusses and clears some of the misconceptions underpinning that lag, including assumptions regarding the links between data sharing, “big data”, “scientific data”, quantitative methods, and later prehistory. The paper then outlines some of the necessary principles underpinning effective data sharing, such as open licenses and formats, metadata, and funding and governance. Through a few examples, we end by stressing the crucial, central role of data sharing for the future of archaeology
Data sharing: misconceptions, principles and potential
Gabriele Gattiglia
Co-primo
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Although data rest at the core of archaeology, systematic data sharing remains relatively limited within the discipline, especially when compared to other fields. After defining the key components and principles underlying data sharing, this contribution discusses and clears some of the misconceptions underpinning that lag, including assumptions regarding the links between data sharing, “big data”, “scientific data”, quantitative methods, and later prehistory. The paper then outlines some of the necessary principles underpinning effective data sharing, such as open licenses and formats, metadata, and funding and governance. Through a few examples, we end by stressing the crucial, central role of data sharing for the future of archaeologyI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


