This paper explores whether large language models (LLMs) can sustain stable moral postures or whether their apparent ethical coherence is merely stochastic. Through a series of zero-shot role-playing prompts combining specific topics and simulated personas, this study31 analyzes linguistic pat-terns using topic modeling, TF-IDF differentiation, log-likelihood (G²), and measures of semantic convergence and entropy. The results show no enduring moral orientation: the models do not “choose”, but statistically recombine fragments of moral discourse inherited from their training corpora. What emerges is a stochastic ethics – an ethics without intentionality, coherence, or agency, yet capable of reflecting human moral structures in probabilistic form. Interpreted through the philosophical framework of moral freedom and the infosphere, the study argues that LLMs act not as moral subjects but as amplifiers of human ethical language, redistributing the moral imaginary of the societies that produce and employ them.

Are There Stable Ethical Postures Inside LLMs? Role-play Prompting and Stochastic Ethics

Emanuele Fulvio Perri
Primo
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper explores whether large language models (LLMs) can sustain stable moral postures or whether their apparent ethical coherence is merely stochastic. Through a series of zero-shot role-playing prompts combining specific topics and simulated personas, this study31 analyzes linguistic pat-terns using topic modeling, TF-IDF differentiation, log-likelihood (G²), and measures of semantic convergence and entropy. The results show no enduring moral orientation: the models do not “choose”, but statistically recombine fragments of moral discourse inherited from their training corpora. What emerges is a stochastic ethics – an ethics without intentionality, coherence, or agency, yet capable of reflecting human moral structures in probabilistic form. Interpreted through the philosophical framework of moral freedom and the infosphere, the study argues that LLMs act not as moral subjects but as amplifiers of human ethical language, redistributing the moral imaginary of the societies that produce and employ them.
2026
Perri, Emanuele Fulvio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1360547
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact