In Judgment No. 204/2025, the Italian Constitutional Court addressed, for the first time in proceedings concerning a principal challenge to legislation, the issue of end-of-life decisions. The case arose from an action brought by the Government challenging Tuscany Regional Law No. 16/2025, entitled “Organisational Arrangements for the Implementation of Constitutional Court Judgments Nos. 242/2019 and 135/2024.” The decision, in conjunction with the judgment No. 148/2026, constitutes an important point of reference for regional legislators because, while it acknowledges the Regions’ authority to regulate the procedural aspects of assisted suicide, placing such measures within the substantive area of the “protection of health”, it also observes that this does not preclude individual provisions from infringing upon the legislative competence reserved to the State. Through a detailed examination of each provision of the Tuscan legislation, the Court identifies the limits within which analogous legislative measures must operate, issuing a series of specific findings of unconstitutionality. In certain instances, these findings affect the substantive rules enacted by the Region, whereas in others, being concerned exclusively with questions of legislative competence, they produce a “formal effect”, without either affecting the framework of principles that the Regional Health Service facilities are required to observe or the scope of the rights enjoyed by applicants.

La Corte definisce l’assetto delle competenze legislative regionali in tema di fine vita, tra punti fermi e (alcune) incertezze argomentative (Nota a Corte cost. 29 dicembre 2025, n. 204)

Antonello Lo Calzo
2026-01-01

Abstract

In Judgment No. 204/2025, the Italian Constitutional Court addressed, for the first time in proceedings concerning a principal challenge to legislation, the issue of end-of-life decisions. The case arose from an action brought by the Government challenging Tuscany Regional Law No. 16/2025, entitled “Organisational Arrangements for the Implementation of Constitutional Court Judgments Nos. 242/2019 and 135/2024.” The decision, in conjunction with the judgment No. 148/2026, constitutes an important point of reference for regional legislators because, while it acknowledges the Regions’ authority to regulate the procedural aspects of assisted suicide, placing such measures within the substantive area of the “protection of health”, it also observes that this does not preclude individual provisions from infringing upon the legislative competence reserved to the State. Through a detailed examination of each provision of the Tuscan legislation, the Court identifies the limits within which analogous legislative measures must operate, issuing a series of specific findings of unconstitutionality. In certain instances, these findings affect the substantive rules enacted by the Region, whereas in others, being concerned exclusively with questions of legislative competence, they produce a “formal effect”, without either affecting the framework of principles that the Regional Health Service facilities are required to observe or the scope of the rights enjoyed by applicants.
2026
Lo Calzo, Antonello
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1373367
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact