The Continuous Innovation Network (CINet) is a global network studying the innovation processes through which the synergistic combination between exploratory and exploitatory activities fosters a synergistic combination of operational effectiveness and strategic flexibility—allowing firms to achieve superior performance. This paper presents the theoretical field of Continuous Innovation as an extension of the intersection of three research streams—namely exploration-exploitation, organizational ambidexterity and paradoxical thinking. Moreover, it presents four papers from the International CINet Conference held in Zürich (CH), from the 5th to the 7th of September 2010.

Continuous Innovation: Towards a Paradoxical, Ambidextrous Combination of Exploration and Exploitation

MARTINI, ANTONELLA;
2013-01-01

Abstract

The Continuous Innovation Network (CINet) is a global network studying the innovation processes through which the synergistic combination between exploratory and exploitatory activities fosters a synergistic combination of operational effectiveness and strategic flexibility—allowing firms to achieve superior performance. This paper presents the theoretical field of Continuous Innovation as an extension of the intersection of three research streams—namely exploration-exploitation, organizational ambidexterity and paradoxical thinking. Moreover, it presents four papers from the International CINet Conference held in Zürich (CH), from the 5th to the 7th of September 2010.
2013
Martini, Antonella; Laugen, Bt; Gastaldi, L; Corso, M.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/153914
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 78
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 64
social impact