A great deal is known, in some ways, about Roman criminal and civil procedure, and about the doings of a Roman court, both from the perspectives of Roman law and legal history and from the perspective of Roman oratory. Here I will try to use the evidence of Roman court proceedings, as available from oratory, rhetorical treatises, and extant legal documents, to build up a small dossier of ‘dialogic exchange in Latin’ tying in with what I have attempted to do on Roman politeness, linguistic turns, conversational registers, and ultimately, the pragmatics of Latin.
Witness vs Lawyer in the Roman courts. Linguistic strategies of evasiveness and turns, intimidation in Roman trial debates.
FERRI, ROLANDO
2014-01-01
Abstract
A great deal is known, in some ways, about Roman criminal and civil procedure, and about the doings of a Roman court, both from the perspectives of Roman law and legal history and from the perspective of Roman oratory. Here I will try to use the evidence of Roman court proceedings, as available from oratory, rhetorical treatises, and extant legal documents, to build up a small dossier of ‘dialogic exchange in Latin’ tying in with what I have attempted to do on Roman politeness, linguistic turns, conversational registers, and ultimately, the pragmatics of Latin.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.