A common belief in economic growth theory is that the instability of the balanced growth path of models based on a non-neoclassical production theory, such as the Harrod–Domar or Goodwin-type models, may be removed by introducing neoclassical technology and substitutability between factors. This does not need to be true. As shown in this paper, Solow-type models with sluggishly adjusting, non-market-clearing, real wages and endogenous fertility may suffer instability. Not only: instability may be favoured by too strong a degree of neoclassical substitution in the economy.
Autori interni: | |
Autori: | Fanti L; Manfredi P |
Titolo: | Neoclassical production theory and growth with unemployment: the stability issue revisited |
Anno del prodotto: | 2009 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1016/j.strueco.2008.12.002 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.