The paper argues that antitrust law and economics is a proper subfield for applying the method and viewpoint of the history of economic thought (het). Hence, antitrust scholars should pay attention to what historians of economics have to say about their subfield. Beyond law and economics, it is argued that there are normative and positive arguments for economists in general to avail themselves of het research.

CROSSED DESTINIES: LAW AND ECONOMICS MEETS THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT

GIOCOLI, NICOLA
2012

Abstract

The paper argues that antitrust law and economics is a proper subfield for applying the method and viewpoint of the history of economic thought (het). Hence, antitrust scholars should pay attention to what historians of economics have to say about their subfield. Beyond law and economics, it is argued that there are normative and positive arguments for economists in general to avail themselves of het research.
Giocoli, Nicola
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11568/278140
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact