Since 1960, when the first hip prosthesis was introduced, up to now, several implant typologies have been proposed trying to meet the increasing clinical demands of more and more active and young patients. A substantial evolution of implant design has been occurring, both in terms of materials and geometry, basically driven by their tribological performances. Indeed, the main concern of hip implants consists in the release of wear debris, which can lead to implant loosening and failure. Thus, many studies on wear and lubrication of hip prostheses have been published in the last 15 years, mainly focused on experimental researches but also on numerical/modeling approaches. The aim of this work is to review the history of hip implants from a tribological point of view with a focus on ceramic-on-ceramic replacements, which represent the most advanced solution in terms of wear strength and chemical inertness. The main drawbacks of these implants, as the brittleness and the squeaking, are discussed and novel solutions examined.
Tribological Behaviour of Ceramic Hip Replacements
CIULLI, ENRICO;DI PUCCIO, FRANCESCA;MATTEI, LORENZA;
2014-01-01
Abstract
Since 1960, when the first hip prosthesis was introduced, up to now, several implant typologies have been proposed trying to meet the increasing clinical demands of more and more active and young patients. A substantial evolution of implant design has been occurring, both in terms of materials and geometry, basically driven by their tribological performances. Indeed, the main concern of hip implants consists in the release of wear debris, which can lead to implant loosening and failure. Thus, many studies on wear and lubrication of hip prostheses have been published in the last 15 years, mainly focused on experimental researches but also on numerical/modeling approaches. The aim of this work is to review the history of hip implants from a tribological point of view with a focus on ceramic-on-ceramic replacements, which represent the most advanced solution in terms of wear strength and chemical inertness. The main drawbacks of these implants, as the brittleness and the squeaking, are discussed and novel solutions examined.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ciulli - Paper Cimtec - Final version.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Importato da Ugov Ricerca - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
906.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
906.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.