INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced NSCLC who experience disease progression after second-line therapy might receive further active treatment. LIFE was an Italian cohort multicenter observational study composed of a cross-sectional and a longitudinal phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the longitudinal phase, described here, the primary aim was to determine the proportion of patients receiving third-line therapy among those who received second-line active treatment according to clinical practice. The proportion of patients receiving further treatment lines was also estimated. RESULTS: The longitudinal phase was conducted between January and August 2012. Of 464 patients who began second-line therapy outside of clinical trials within the baseline evaluation, 56 (12.1%) were still receiving second-line therapy at the end of the observation period and 17 (3.7%) withdrew during or after second-line therapy. Of the remaining 391 patients, 158 (40.4%) received third-line treatment outside of clinical trials: 93 received a third-line chemotherapy and 65 a targeted agent. The main reason for interrupting third-line treatment was disease progression or death. During the same observation period, 25 of 113 patients who completed a third-line therapy received a fourth line of treatment. From diagnosis of NSCLC to the end of observation, biomarkers were tested in 323 patients (59.7%): epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in 315 (58.2%), Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations in 83 (15.3%) and Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation in 84 (15.5%). CONCLUSION: In Italian clinical practice, the proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving more than 2 treatment lines of therapy is not negligible.

Management of Italian Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Second-Line Treatment: Results of the Longitudinal Phase of the LIFE Observational Study.

FONTANINI, GABRIELLA;
2014-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced NSCLC who experience disease progression after second-line therapy might receive further active treatment. LIFE was an Italian cohort multicenter observational study composed of a cross-sectional and a longitudinal phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the longitudinal phase, described here, the primary aim was to determine the proportion of patients receiving third-line therapy among those who received second-line active treatment according to clinical practice. The proportion of patients receiving further treatment lines was also estimated. RESULTS: The longitudinal phase was conducted between January and August 2012. Of 464 patients who began second-line therapy outside of clinical trials within the baseline evaluation, 56 (12.1%) were still receiving second-line therapy at the end of the observation period and 17 (3.7%) withdrew during or after second-line therapy. Of the remaining 391 patients, 158 (40.4%) received third-line treatment outside of clinical trials: 93 received a third-line chemotherapy and 65 a targeted agent. The main reason for interrupting third-line treatment was disease progression or death. During the same observation period, 25 of 113 patients who completed a third-line therapy received a fourth line of treatment. From diagnosis of NSCLC to the end of observation, biomarkers were tested in 323 patients (59.7%): epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in 315 (58.2%), Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations in 83 (15.3%) and Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation in 84 (15.5%). CONCLUSION: In Italian clinical practice, the proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving more than 2 treatment lines of therapy is not negligible.
2014
de Marinis, F; Ardizzoni, A; Fontanini, Gabriella; Grossi, F; Cappuzzo, F; Novello, S; Santo, A; Lorusso, V; Cortinovis, D; Iurlaro, M; Galetta, D; Gridelli, C; Pedrazzoli, P; Siena, S; Alabiso, O; Bilancia, D; Cinieri, S; Cartenì, G; Fasola, G; Ferraù, F; Milella, M; Contu, A; Giuffrida, D; Illiano, A; Ravaioli, A; Zaniboni, A; Bettini, A; Caprioli, A; Longo, F; Cruciani, G; Defraia, E; Favaretto, A; Amadori, D; Clerico, M; Di Costanzo, F; Gamucci, T; Caruso, M; Iacobelli, S; Pinotti, G; Pozzessere, D; Maiello, E; Marchetti, P; Passalacqua, R; Pavesi, L; Tortora, G; Aglietta, M; Bianco, R; Brandes, A; Ciuffreda, L; Daniele, B; Demichelis, C; Romito, S; Tamberi, S; Barni, S; Barbieri, F; Giordano, M; Bracarda, S; Crinò, L; Marzano, N; Merlano, M; Numico, G.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/564067
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact