In the present paper, we discuss the debated case of the rhotacization of s in Aristophanes and its relationship with the Spartan inscriptions of the 2nd century AD. We advance the hypothesis that the Laconian rhotacization of s dates back to the 5th century BC, but had a low diastratic status and was, therefore, excluded from the written language until it was revived in the Hellenistic period. The results of this study show how the dynamics of sociolinguistic dimensions may shed light on both historical patterns of language organisation and philological disputes.
Sociolinguistic variation and diachronic evidence: a case of Laconian rhotacization in the Lysistrata
ROMAGNO, DOMENICA
2015-01-01
Abstract
In the present paper, we discuss the debated case of the rhotacization of s in Aristophanes and its relationship with the Spartan inscriptions of the 2nd century AD. We advance the hypothesis that the Laconian rhotacization of s dates back to the 5th century BC, but had a low diastratic status and was, therefore, excluded from the written language until it was revived in the Hellenistic period. The results of this study show how the dynamics of sociolinguistic dimensions may shed light on both historical patterns of language organisation and philological disputes.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ROMAGNO_παλαιόρ_InVerbis_2015.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
7.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.