OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between delayed oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) and esophageal motility abnormalities in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive SSc patients and 60 healthy volunteers (HVs) as controls. Both groups underwent glucose breath test (GBT) to exclude small intestine bacterial overgrowth, lactulose hydrogen, and octanoic acid breath tests (LHBT and OBT) to measure OCTT and gastric emptying (GE), respectively, and manometry to assess esophageal motility. RESULTS: Thirty-one (63%) SSc patients presented ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) compared with 3 HVs (5%; P<0.01), 37 (74%) had an abnormal OCTT compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01), and 16 (32%) had an altered GE compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01). The median OCTT and gastric t½ were longer in SSc than in HVs (165 min vs. 101 min and 125 min vs. 78 min, respectively; P <0.01). A delayed GE was present in 12/37 (32%), whereas IEM in 27/37 (73%) SSc patients with prolonged OCTT. The prevalence of IEM increased in parallel with the prolongation of OCTT (31% when OCTT<150 min, 73% when OCTT≥150 min, and up to 85% when OCTT>180 min, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities of both esophageal and small intestine motility are frequent in SSc patients and esophageal motility is altered in most cases with small bowel involvement. Delayed GE plays a limited role in prolonging OCTT. LHBT is a non-invasive, cheap, well-tolerated diagnostic tool that may be useful to estimate intestinal involvement and also to estimate a higher risk of esophageal hypomotility in SSc patients.

Lactulose Breath Test to Assess Oro-cecal Transit Delay and Estimate Esophageal Dysmotility in Scleroderma Patients

DE BORTOLI, NICOLA;
2013-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between delayed oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) and esophageal motility abnormalities in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive SSc patients and 60 healthy volunteers (HVs) as controls. Both groups underwent glucose breath test (GBT) to exclude small intestine bacterial overgrowth, lactulose hydrogen, and octanoic acid breath tests (LHBT and OBT) to measure OCTT and gastric emptying (GE), respectively, and manometry to assess esophageal motility. RESULTS: Thirty-one (63%) SSc patients presented ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) compared with 3 HVs (5%; P<0.01), 37 (74%) had an abnormal OCTT compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01), and 16 (32%) had an altered GE compared with 4 HVs (7%; P <0.01). The median OCTT and gastric t½ were longer in SSc than in HVs (165 min vs. 101 min and 125 min vs. 78 min, respectively; P <0.01). A delayed GE was present in 12/37 (32%), whereas IEM in 27/37 (73%) SSc patients with prolonged OCTT. The prevalence of IEM increased in parallel with the prolongation of OCTT (31% when OCTT<150 min, 73% when OCTT≥150 min, and up to 85% when OCTT>180 min, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities of both esophageal and small intestine motility are frequent in SSc patients and esophageal motility is altered in most cases with small bowel involvement. Delayed GE plays a limited role in prolonging OCTT. LHBT is a non-invasive, cheap, well-tolerated diagnostic tool that may be useful to estimate intestinal involvement and also to estimate a higher risk of esophageal hypomotility in SSc patients.
2013
Gemignani, Lorenzo; Savarino, Vincenzo; Ghio, Massimo; Parodi, Andrea; Zentilin, Patrizia; DE BORTOLI, Nicola; Negrini, Simone; Furnari, Manuele; Dulbecco, Pietro; Giambruno, Elisa; Savarino, Edoardo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gemignani_Semin Arthritis Rheum_2012.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 286 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/772172
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact