The present paper deals with the necessity to establish the identity of a poorly described, mostly neglected, and yet untypified name, i.e., Crocus purpureus Weston. This name was described by Weston (Bot. Univ. 2: 238. 1771) with a protologue consisting only of the following: “— idem [this stands for “Crocus vernus latifolius”], flore purpureo magno. / Large purple Crocus.” After some literature research, it may be argued that this polynomial originated from Bauhin (Pinax: 65. 1623). In turn...

Proposal to reject the name Crocus purpureus (Iridaceae)

PERUZZI, LORENZO
2016-01-01

Abstract

The present paper deals with the necessity to establish the identity of a poorly described, mostly neglected, and yet untypified name, i.e., Crocus purpureus Weston. This name was described by Weston (Bot. Univ. 2: 238. 1771) with a protologue consisting only of the following: “— idem [this stands for “Crocus vernus latifolius”], flore purpureo magno. / Large purple Crocus.” After some literature research, it may be argued that this polynomial originated from Bauhin (Pinax: 65. 1623). In turn...
2016
Peruzzi, Lorenzo
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/798112
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact