From 1989 through 1996, 10 children affected by high grade bone tumors of the proximal tibia underwent an intraepiphyseal intercalary resection. The residual epiphyseal bone segment measured less than 2 cm in thickness in all cases and reconstruction always was performed using the combination of a vascularized fibular autograft and a massive bone allograft. The proximal epiphyseal osteosynthesis was fixed by small fragment screws. The aim of this study was to report the growth pattern of the residual proximal tibial epiphysis and to evaluate any possible lower limb discrepancy and/or deformity after the end of skeletal maturity. At current followup six patients were available for the final evaluation. Radiographic documentation included computed tomography scan of both knees before surgery, a panoramic radiographic view and a computed tomography scan of both lower limbs after the end of skeletal growth. The length of both femurs and tibias, the size of the tibial plateau and of the opposite distal femur, and any possible deformity of femur or tibia were measured and compared with the preoperative data. No patient had a limb length discrepancy greater than 3.5 cm. In all cases the ipsilateral femur had a valgus deformity of the hip develop. In two patients this deformity was associated with an elongation of the femur, partially compensating for the shortening of the tibia. The tibial plateau close to reconstruction grew less than the contralateral one (range 2%-8%) but maintained its normal relationship with the distal femur. None of these patients reported any restriction in recreational activities. They could walk, run, and jump. Their functional result according the International Society of Limb Salvage functional grading system was satisfactory in all cases.

Intraepiphyseal Resection of the Proximal Tibia and its Impact on Lower Limb Growth

CAPANNA, RODOLFO;
1999-01-01

Abstract

From 1989 through 1996, 10 children affected by high grade bone tumors of the proximal tibia underwent an intraepiphyseal intercalary resection. The residual epiphyseal bone segment measured less than 2 cm in thickness in all cases and reconstruction always was performed using the combination of a vascularized fibular autograft and a massive bone allograft. The proximal epiphyseal osteosynthesis was fixed by small fragment screws. The aim of this study was to report the growth pattern of the residual proximal tibial epiphysis and to evaluate any possible lower limb discrepancy and/or deformity after the end of skeletal maturity. At current followup six patients were available for the final evaluation. Radiographic documentation included computed tomography scan of both knees before surgery, a panoramic radiographic view and a computed tomography scan of both lower limbs after the end of skeletal growth. The length of both femurs and tibias, the size of the tibial plateau and of the opposite distal femur, and any possible deformity of femur or tibia were measured and compared with the preoperative data. No patient had a limb length discrepancy greater than 3.5 cm. In all cases the ipsilateral femur had a valgus deformity of the hip develop. In two patients this deformity was associated with an elongation of the femur, partially compensating for the shortening of the tibia. The tibial plateau close to reconstruction grew less than the contralateral one (range 2%-8%) but maintained its normal relationship with the distal femur. None of these patients reported any restriction in recreational activities. They could walk, run, and jump. Their functional result according the International Society of Limb Salvage functional grading system was satisfactory in all cases.
1999
Manfrini, M; Gasbarrini, A; Malaguti, C; Ceruso, M; Innocenti, M; Bini, S; Capanna, Rodolfo; Campanacci, M.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/801753
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact