We analyze how a larger presence of female evaluators affects committee decision-making using information on 100,000 applications to associate and full professorships in Italy and Spain. These applications were assessed by 8,000 randomly selected evaluators. A larger number of women in evaluation committees does not increase either the quantity or the quality of female candidates who qualify. Information from individual voting reports suggests that female evaluators are not significantly more favorable towards female candidates. At the same time, male evaluators become less favorable towards female candidates as soon as a female evaluator joins the committee.
Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?
SYLOS LABINI, MAURO;
2017-01-01
Abstract
We analyze how a larger presence of female evaluators affects committee decision-making using information on 100,000 applications to associate and full professorships in Italy and Spain. These applications were assessed by 8,000 randomly selected evaluators. A larger number of women in evaluation committees does not increase either the quantity or the quality of female candidates who qualify. Information from individual voting reports suggests that female evaluators are not significantly more favorable towards female candidates. At the same time, male evaluators become less favorable towards female candidates as soon as a female evaluator joins the committee.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
aer.20151211.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
595.55 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
595.55 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
SylosLabini_810593.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
387.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
387.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.