Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
Breast cancers demonstrate substantial biological, clinical and etiological heterogeneity. We investigated breast cancer risk associations of eight susceptibility loci identified in GWAS and two putative susceptibility loci in candidate genes in relation to specific breast tumor subtypes. Subtypes were defined by five markers (ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR) and other pathological and clinical features. Analyses included up to 30 040 invasive breast cancer cases and 53 692 controls from 31 studies within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We confirmed previous reports of stronger associations with ER1 than ER2 tumors for six of the eight loci identified in GWAS: rs2981582 (10q26) (P-heterogeneity = 6.1 × 10-18), rs3803662 (16q12) (P = 3.7 × 10-5), rs13281615 (8q24) (P = 0.002), rs13387042 (2q35) (P = 0.006), rs4973768 (3p24) (P = 0.003) and rs6504950 (17q23) (P = 0.002). The two candidate loci, CASP8 (rs1045485, rs17468277) and TGFB1 (rs1982073), were most strongly related with the risk of PR negative tumors (P = 5.1 × 10-6 and P = 4.1 × 10-4, respectively), as previously suggested. Four of the eight loci identified in GWAS were associated with triple negative tumors (P ≤ 0.016): rs3803662 (16q12), rs889312 (5q11), rs3817198 (11p15) and rs13387042 (2q35); however, only two of them (16q12 and 2q35) were associated with tumors with the core basal phenotype (P ≤ 0.002). These analyses are consistent with different biological origins of breast cancers, and indicate that tumor stratification might help in the identification and characterization of novel risk factors for breast cancer subtypes. This may eventually result in further improvements in prevention, early detection and treatment.
Low penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with specific breast tumor subtypes: Findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Broeks, Annegien;Schmidt, Marjanka K.;Sherman, Mark E.;Couch, Fergus J.;Hopper, John L.;Dite, Gillian S.;Apicella, Carmel;Smith, Letitia D.;Hammet, Fleur;Southey, Melissa C.;Van't Veer, Laura J.;De Groot, Renate;Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.;Fasching, Peter A.;Beckmann, Matthias W.;Jud, Sebastian;Ekici, Arif B.;Hartmann, Arndt;Hein, Alexander;Schulz Wendtland, Ruediger;Burwinkel, Barbara;Marme, Frederik;Schneeweiss, Andreas;Sinn, Hans Peter;Sohn, Christof;Tchatchou, Sandrine;Bojesen, Stig E.;Nordestgaard, Børge G.;Flyger, Henrik;Ørsted, David D.;Kaur Knudsen, Diljit;Milne, Roger L.;Pérez, Jose I. Arias;Zamora, Pilar;Rodríguez, Primitiva Menéndez;Benítez, Javier;Brauch, Hiltrud;Justenhoven, Christina;Ko, Yon Dschun;Network, The Genica;Hamann, Ute;Fischer, Hans Peter;Brüning, Thomas;Pesch, Beate;Chang Claude, Jenny;Wang Gohrke, Shan;Bremer, Michael;Karstens, Johann H.;Hillemanns, Peter;Dörk, Thilo;Nevanlinna, Heli A.;Heikkinen, Tuomas;Heikkilä, Päivi;Blomqvist, Carl;Aittomäki, Kristiina;Aaltonen, Kirsimari;Lindblom, Annika;Margolin, Sara;Mannermaa, Arto;Kosma, Veli Matti;Kauppinen, Jaana M.;Kataja, Vesa;Auvinen, Päivi;Eskelinen, Matti;Soini, Ylermi;Chenevix Trench, Georgia;Spurdle, Amanda B.;Beesley, Jonathan;Chen, Xiaoqing;Holland, Helene;Lambrechts, Diether;Claes, Bart;Vandorpe, Thijs;Neven, Patrick;Wildiers, Hans;Flesch Janys, Dieter;Hein, Rebecca;Löning, Thomas;Kosel, Matthew;Fredericksen, Zachary S.;Wang, Xianshu;Giles, Graham G.;BAGLIETTO, LAURA;Severi, Gianluca;Mclean, Catriona;Haiman, Christopher A.;Henderson, Brian E.;Le Marchand, Loic;Kolonel, Laurence N.;Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker;Kristensen, Vessela;Børresen Dale, Anne Lise;Hunter, David J.;Hankinson, Susan E.;Andrulis, Irene L.;Mulligan, Anna Marie;O'Malley, Frances P.;Devilee, Peter;Huijts, Petra E. A.;Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.;Van Asperen, Christi J.;Seynaeve, Caroline S.;Chanock, Stephen J.;Lissowska, Jolanta;Brinton, Louise;Peplonska, Beata;Figueroa, Jonine;Yang, Xiaohong R.;Hooning, Maartje J.;Hollestelle, Antoinette;Oldenburg, Rogier A.;Jager, Agnes;Kriege, Mieke;Ozturk, Bahar;Van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.;Hall, Per;Czene, Kamila;Humphreys, Keith;Liu, Jianjun;Cox, Angela;Connley, Daniel;Cramp, Helen E.;Cross, Simon S.;Balasubramanian, Sabapathy P.;Reed, Malcolm W. R.;Dunning, Alison M.;Easton, Douglas F.;Humphreys, Manjeet K.;Caldas, Carlos;Blows, Fiona;Driver, Kristy;Provenzano, Elena;Lubinski, Jan;Jakubowska, Anna;Huzarski, Tomasz;Byrski, Tomasz;Cybulski, Cezary;Gorski, Bohdan;Gronwald, Jacek;Brennan, Paul;Sangrajrang, Suleeporn;Gaborieau, Valerie;Shen, Chen Yang;Hsiung, Chia Ni;Yu, Jyh Cherng;Chen, Shou Tung;Hsu, Giu Cheng;Hou, Ming Feng;Huang, Chiun Sheng;Anton Culver, Hoda;Ziogas, Argyrios;Pharoah, Paul D. P.;Garcia Closas, Montserrat
2011-01-01
Abstract
Breast cancers demonstrate substantial biological, clinical and etiological heterogeneity. We investigated breast cancer risk associations of eight susceptibility loci identified in GWAS and two putative susceptibility loci in candidate genes in relation to specific breast tumor subtypes. Subtypes were defined by five markers (ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR) and other pathological and clinical features. Analyses included up to 30 040 invasive breast cancer cases and 53 692 controls from 31 studies within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We confirmed previous reports of stronger associations with ER1 than ER2 tumors for six of the eight loci identified in GWAS: rs2981582 (10q26) (P-heterogeneity = 6.1 × 10-18), rs3803662 (16q12) (P = 3.7 × 10-5), rs13281615 (8q24) (P = 0.002), rs13387042 (2q35) (P = 0.006), rs4973768 (3p24) (P = 0.003) and rs6504950 (17q23) (P = 0.002). The two candidate loci, CASP8 (rs1045485, rs17468277) and TGFB1 (rs1982073), were most strongly related with the risk of PR negative tumors (P = 5.1 × 10-6 and P = 4.1 × 10-4, respectively), as previously suggested. Four of the eight loci identified in GWAS were associated with triple negative tumors (P ≤ 0.016): rs3803662 (16q12), rs889312 (5q11), rs3817198 (11p15) and rs13387042 (2q35); however, only two of them (16q12 and 2q35) were associated with tumors with the core basal phenotype (P ≤ 0.002). These analyses are consistent with different biological origins of breast cancers, and indicate that tumor stratification might help in the identification and characterization of novel risk factors for breast cancer subtypes. This may eventually result in further improvements in prevention, early detection and treatment.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/817706
Citazioni
98
149
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.