OBJECTIVES: Treat-to-target recommendations have identified 'remission' as a target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but recognise that there is no universally accepted definition for this. Therefore, we initiated a process to achieve consensus on potential definitions for remission in SLE. METHODS: An international task force of 60 specialists and patient representatives participated in preparatory exercises, a face-to-face meeting and follow-up electronic voting. The level for agreement was set at 90%. RESULTS: The task force agreed on eight key statements regarding remission in SLE and three principles to guide the further development of remission definitions:1. Definitions of remission will be worded as follows: remission in SLE is a durable state characterised by …………………. (reference to symptoms, signs, routine labs).2. For defining remission, a validated index must be used, for example, clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI)=0, British Isles lupus assessment group (BILAG) 2004 D/E only, clinical European consensus lupus outcome measure (ECLAM)=0; with routine laboratory assessments included, and supplemented with physician's global assessment.3. Distinction is made between remission off and on therapy: remission off therapy requires the patient to be on no other treatment for SLE than maintenance antimalarials; and remission on therapy allows patients to be on stable maintenance antimalarials, low-dose corticosteroids (prednisone ≤5 mg/day), maintenance immunosuppressives and/or maintenance biologics.The task force also agreed that the most appropriate outcomes (dependent variables) for testing the prognostic value (construct validity) of potential remission definitions are: death, damage, flares and measures of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The work of this international task force provides a framework for testing different definitions of remission against long-term outcomes

A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS)

MOSCA, MARTA;
2017-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Treat-to-target recommendations have identified 'remission' as a target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but recognise that there is no universally accepted definition for this. Therefore, we initiated a process to achieve consensus on potential definitions for remission in SLE. METHODS: An international task force of 60 specialists and patient representatives participated in preparatory exercises, a face-to-face meeting and follow-up electronic voting. The level for agreement was set at 90%. RESULTS: The task force agreed on eight key statements regarding remission in SLE and three principles to guide the further development of remission definitions:1. Definitions of remission will be worded as follows: remission in SLE is a durable state characterised by …………………. (reference to symptoms, signs, routine labs).2. For defining remission, a validated index must be used, for example, clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI)=0, British Isles lupus assessment group (BILAG) 2004 D/E only, clinical European consensus lupus outcome measure (ECLAM)=0; with routine laboratory assessments included, and supplemented with physician's global assessment.3. Distinction is made between remission off and on therapy: remission off therapy requires the patient to be on no other treatment for SLE than maintenance antimalarials; and remission on therapy allows patients to be on stable maintenance antimalarials, low-dose corticosteroids (prednisone ≤5 mg/day), maintenance immunosuppressives and/or maintenance biologics.The task force also agreed that the most appropriate outcomes (dependent variables) for testing the prognostic value (construct validity) of potential remission definitions are: death, damage, flares and measures of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The work of this international task force provides a framework for testing different definitions of remission against long-term outcomes
2017
van Vollenhoven, R; Voskuyl, A; Bertsias, G; Aranow, C; Aringer, M; Arnaud, L; Askanase, A; Balážová, P; Bonfa, E; Bootsma, H; Boumpas, D; Bruce, I; Cervera, R; Clarke, A; Coney, C; Costedoat Chalumeau, N; Czirják, L; Derksen, R; Doria, A; Dörner, T; Fischer Betz, R; Fritsch Stork, R; Gordon, C; Graninger, W; Györi, N; Houssiau, F; Isenberg, D; Jacobsen, S; Jayne, D; Kuhn, A; Le Guern, V; Lerstrøm, K; Levy, R; Machado Ribeiro, F; Mariette, X; Missaykeh, J; Morand, E; Mosca, Marta; Inanc, M; Navarra, S; Neumann, I; Olesinska, M; Petri, M; Rahman, A; Rekvig, Op; Rovensky, J; Shoenfeld, Y; Smolen, J; Tincani, A; Urowitz, M; van Leeuw, B; Vasconcelos, C; Voss, A; Werth, Vp; Zakharova, H; Zoma, A; Schneider, M; Ward, M.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/820811
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 57
  • Scopus 244
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 233
social impact