The article discusses six passages of Aeschylus’ Agamemnon, reconsidering some neglected variants (vv. 310-311, 1093-4), and pointing out the necessity of a better evaluation of the paradosis in verses that have been often considered definitively emended (vv. 1309, 1385-7, 1526-7). About vv. 1196-7, the author argues that the widely accepted interpretation of ἐκμαρτύρησον and προυμόσας as terms borrowed from the technical language of the Attic process is wrong, and that it should not be taken as the starting point for the emendation of the passage.
Minima Aeschylea. Alcune riflessioni sul testo dell'Agamennone
MEDDA, ENRICO
2015-01-01
Abstract
The article discusses six passages of Aeschylus’ Agamemnon, reconsidering some neglected variants (vv. 310-311, 1093-4), and pointing out the necessity of a better evaluation of the paradosis in verses that have been often considered definitively emended (vv. 1309, 1385-7, 1526-7). About vv. 1196-7, the author argues that the widely accepted interpretation of ἐκμαρτύρησον and προυμόσας as terms borrowed from the technical language of the Attic process is wrong, and that it should not be taken as the starting point for the emendation of the passage.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
BollClass2015.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.