This paper introduces two types of abduction associated to two different ways of generating conjectures that arise from using a particular dragging modality in dynamic geometry. We refer to such dragging modality as maintaining dragging (MD). A first use of MD relies on physical dragging-support and it seems to lead the solver “automatically” to the formulation of a conjecture. In this case the abductive reasoning seems to occur at a meta-level and to be concealed within the MD instrument. On the other hand, some of our data shed light onto a different way of generating conjectures which is rooted in use of MD but is “freed” from the physical dragging-support. In this case abductive reasoning seems to occur at the level of the dynamic exploration.
Abduction in Generating Conjectures in dynamic Geometry through Maintaining Dragging
BACCAGLINI-FRANK, ANNA ETHELWYN
Primo
2011-01-01
Abstract
This paper introduces two types of abduction associated to two different ways of generating conjectures that arise from using a particular dragging modality in dynamic geometry. We refer to such dragging modality as maintaining dragging (MD). A first use of MD relies on physical dragging-support and it seems to lead the solver “automatically” to the formulation of a conjecture. In this case the abductive reasoning seems to occur at a meta-level and to be concealed within the MD instrument. On the other hand, some of our data shed light onto a different way of generating conjectures which is rooted in use of MD but is “freed” from the physical dragging-support. In this case abductive reasoning seems to occur at the level of the dynamic exploration.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cerme7_WG1_Baccaglini-Frank.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
258.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
258.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.