The aim of this paper is to illustrate and critically discuss events, debates, legal and political facts developing after the rejection of the constitutional reform by the constitutional referendum occurred in the past December. In the section I the paper takes into consideration the crisis of government, underlining its characters and peculiarities; in the section II it studies the consequences of the crisis, with a special attention to the kind of government created due to the crisis. The sections III, IV and V focus on the main post-referendum issue, which is the choice of the electoral system. The paper analyzes the problems deriving from the rejection of the constitutional reform for the (potential) application of the legge 6 May 2015 no 52. Then, it studies the complaints filed to the Constitutional Court, investigates the ways open to the Court, and, at the end, makes a focus on the recent decision of the Constitutional Court (judgment no 35 of 2017). The last section proposes some concluding remarks, taking into consideration three main features that seem to be affected by the ‘post-referendum’ events: the system of government; the relationship between representative and direct democracy; and the role of the Constitutional Court, permanently swinging between politics and jurisdiction.

Italy after the Constitutional Referendum: Legal and Political Scenarios, from the Public Debate to the ‘Electoral Question’

STRADELLA, ELETTRA
2017-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to illustrate and critically discuss events, debates, legal and political facts developing after the rejection of the constitutional reform by the constitutional referendum occurred in the past December. In the section I the paper takes into consideration the crisis of government, underlining its characters and peculiarities; in the section II it studies the consequences of the crisis, with a special attention to the kind of government created due to the crisis. The sections III, IV and V focus on the main post-referendum issue, which is the choice of the electoral system. The paper analyzes the problems deriving from the rejection of the constitutional reform for the (potential) application of the legge 6 May 2015 no 52. Then, it studies the complaints filed to the Constitutional Court, investigates the ways open to the Court, and, at the end, makes a focus on the recent decision of the Constitutional Court (judgment no 35 of 2017). The last section proposes some concluding remarks, taking into consideration three main features that seem to be affected by the ‘post-referendum’ events: the system of government; the relationship between representative and direct democracy; and the role of the Constitutional Court, permanently swinging between politics and jurisdiction.
2017
Stradella, Elettra
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
STRADELLA_ItaLJ.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 306.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
306.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/851596
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact