This paper challenges the results of the “classical” managerial delegation literature, where it is assumed that the weight of the managerial bonus only depends on the owner’s will to maximise his own profits. By considering sales (S) (resp. relative profit (RP)) contracts, the received literature has found that (S,S) (resp. (RP,RP)) is the unique pure-strategy sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium in a game that contrasts S (resp. RP) with pure profit maximisation (PM). This paper shows that none of the previous results may not hold when the owner negotiates about managerial compensation with his manager.
Managerial Delegation Theory Revisited
FANTI, LUCIANO;GORI, LUCA
;SODINI, MAURO
2017-01-01
Abstract
This paper challenges the results of the “classical” managerial delegation literature, where it is assumed that the weight of the managerial bonus only depends on the owner’s will to maximise his own profits. By considering sales (S) (resp. relative profit (RP)) contracts, the received literature has found that (S,S) (resp. (RP,RP)) is the unique pure-strategy sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium in a game that contrasts S (resp. RP) with pure profit maximisation (PM). This paper shows that none of the previous results may not hold when the owner negotiates about managerial compensation with his manager.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MDE_Post_Print.pdf
Open Access dal 01/07/2019
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
670.92 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
670.92 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Fanti, Gori and Sodini 2017 MDE.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
290.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
290.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.