Aims The cost-effectiveness of screening for silent coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 2 diabetes (DM2) is still debated. Methods We applied a diagnostic algorithm for silent CHD detection, in a cohort of 102 asymptomatic DM2 subjects (57 ± 7 years), attending 5 Italian outpatient clinics, to verify its predictive value. The risk of silent CHD was calculated considering classical risk factors, and presence of microangiopathy/macroangiopathy. Patients were divided in 3 groups, i.e. group 1: normal ECG and low silent CHD risk; group 2: abnormal ECG, irrespective of silent CHD risk; group 3: high silent CHD risk, irrespective of ECG. To group 2 and 3, a functional test was recommended and performed in 78% of patients. Results Silent CHD prevalence was similar in group 2 and 3 (25 vs. 17% respectively; p = 0.495). However, evaluating the entire cohort, a significant higher prevalence of silent CHD was observed in subjects with abnormal vs. normal ECG (23 vs. 4%; P = 0.004), but not in subjects with high vs. low pre-test silent CHD risk (14 vs. 9%; p = 0.472). Conclusions An abnormal ECG was a strong, independent predictor of silent CHD (OR 8.9; CI 1.27–62.5; p = 0.028) in DM2. Therefore, a functional stress testing should be considered in DM2 patients with ECG abnormalities.

Silent coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Application of a screening approach in a follow-up study

Solini, Anna;Vitolo, Edoardo;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Aims The cost-effectiveness of screening for silent coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 2 diabetes (DM2) is still debated. Methods We applied a diagnostic algorithm for silent CHD detection, in a cohort of 102 asymptomatic DM2 subjects (57 ± 7 years), attending 5 Italian outpatient clinics, to verify its predictive value. The risk of silent CHD was calculated considering classical risk factors, and presence of microangiopathy/macroangiopathy. Patients were divided in 3 groups, i.e. group 1: normal ECG and low silent CHD risk; group 2: abnormal ECG, irrespective of silent CHD risk; group 3: high silent CHD risk, irrespective of ECG. To group 2 and 3, a functional test was recommended and performed in 78% of patients. Results Silent CHD prevalence was similar in group 2 and 3 (25 vs. 17% respectively; p = 0.495). However, evaluating the entire cohort, a significant higher prevalence of silent CHD was observed in subjects with abnormal vs. normal ECG (23 vs. 4%; P = 0.004), but not in subjects with high vs. low pre-test silent CHD risk (14 vs. 9%; p = 0.472). Conclusions An abnormal ECG was a strong, independent predictor of silent CHD (OR 8.9; CI 1.27–62.5; p = 0.028) in DM2. Therefore, a functional stress testing should be considered in DM2 patients with ECG abnormalities.
2017
Vigili de Kreutzenberg, Saula; Solini, Anna; Vitolo, Edoardo; Boi, Alessandra; Bacci, Simonetta; Cocozza, Sara; Nappo, Rossella; Rivellese, Angela; Avogaro, Angelo; Baroni, Marco Giorgio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/888201
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact