In which way, following the two strategies mentioned above (the reference to the “civil theology” and to the “mysticism”) is it possible to avoid the aporias that have polluted relationships among religions? The general answer is quite simple. We need to experience true, authentic relationships. These kinds of relationships may welcome differences and not eliminate them: they are emphasized merely by means of differences. In other terms, we have to interpret differences as pieces of a unique puzzle. This can be obtained only if we conceive unity not as homologation but instead as a mosaic that respect every single diversity.
Two strategies for the future of interreligious dialogue
Adriano Fabris
2017-01-01
Abstract
In which way, following the two strategies mentioned above (the reference to the “civil theology” and to the “mysticism”) is it possible to avoid the aporias that have polluted relationships among religions? The general answer is quite simple. We need to experience true, authentic relationships. These kinds of relationships may welcome differences and not eliminate them: they are emphasized merely by means of differences. In other terms, we have to interpret differences as pieces of a unique puzzle. This can be obtained only if we conceive unity not as homologation but instead as a mosaic that respect every single diversity.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
