Many behavioral measures of visual perception fluctuate continually in a rhythmic manner, reflecting the influence of endogenous brain oscillations, particularly theta (∼4–7 Hz) and alpha (∼8–12 Hz) rhythms [1–3]. However, it is unclear whether these oscillations are unique to vision or whether auditory performance also oscillates [4, 5]. Several studies report no oscillatory modulation in audition [6, 7], while those with positive findings suffer from confounds relating to neural entrainment [8–10]. Here, we used a bilateral pitch-identification task to investigate rhythmic fluctuations in auditory performance separately for the two ears and applied signal detection theory (SDT) to test for oscillations of both sensitivity and criterion (changes in decision boundary) [11, 12]. Using uncorrelated dichotic white noise to induce a phase reset of oscillations, we demonstrate that, as with vision, both auditory sensitivity and criterion showed strong oscillations over time, at different frequencies: ∼6 Hz (theta range) for sensitivity and ∼8 Hz (low alpha range) for criterion, implying distinct underlying sampling mechanisms [13]. The modulation in sensitivity in left and right ears was in antiphase, suggestive of attention-like mechanisms sampling alternatively from the two ears. Using signal detection theory, Ho et al. report that both perceptual sensitivity and decision criterion oscillate in audition (at 6 Hz and 8 Hz, respectively). The oscillations in sensitivity suggest alternate sampling of the two ears by attention-like mechanisms. Rhythmic oscillations seem to be a general phenomenon of many aspects of perception.

Auditory Sensitivity and Decision Criteria Oscillate at Different Frequencies Separately for the Two Ears

HO, HAO TAM
;
Burr, David C.;Morrone, Maria Concetta
2017-01-01

Abstract

Many behavioral measures of visual perception fluctuate continually in a rhythmic manner, reflecting the influence of endogenous brain oscillations, particularly theta (∼4–7 Hz) and alpha (∼8–12 Hz) rhythms [1–3]. However, it is unclear whether these oscillations are unique to vision or whether auditory performance also oscillates [4, 5]. Several studies report no oscillatory modulation in audition [6, 7], while those with positive findings suffer from confounds relating to neural entrainment [8–10]. Here, we used a bilateral pitch-identification task to investigate rhythmic fluctuations in auditory performance separately for the two ears and applied signal detection theory (SDT) to test for oscillations of both sensitivity and criterion (changes in decision boundary) [11, 12]. Using uncorrelated dichotic white noise to induce a phase reset of oscillations, we demonstrate that, as with vision, both auditory sensitivity and criterion showed strong oscillations over time, at different frequencies: ∼6 Hz (theta range) for sensitivity and ∼8 Hz (low alpha range) for criterion, implying distinct underlying sampling mechanisms [13]. The modulation in sensitivity in left and right ears was in antiphase, suggestive of attention-like mechanisms sampling alternatively from the two ears. Using signal detection theory, Ho et al. report that both perceptual sensitivity and decision criterion oscillate in audition (at 6 Hz and 8 Hz, respectively). The oscillations in sensitivity suggest alternate sampling of the two ears by attention-like mechanisms. Rhythmic oscillations seem to be a general phenomenon of many aspects of perception.
2017
Ho, HAO TAM; Leung, Johahn; Burr, David C.; Alais, David; Morrone, Maria Concetta
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/889183
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact