Background Mammographic density is a known heritable risk factor for breast cancer, but reports how tumor characteristics and family history may modify this association are inconsistent. Methods Dense and total breast areas were assessed using Cumulus™ from pre-diagnostic mammograms for 820 invasive breast cancer cases and 820 matched controls nested within the French E3N cohort study. To allow comparisons across models, percent mammographic density (PMD) was standardized to the distribution of the controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of breast cancer risk for mammographic density were estimated by conditional logistic regression while adjusting for age and body mass index. Heterogeneity according to tumor characteristic and family history was assessed using stratified analyses. Results Overall, the OR per 1 SD for PMD was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.33–1.69). No evidence for significant heterogeneity by tumor size, lymph node status, grade, and hormone receptor status (estrogen, progesterone, and HER2) was detected. However, the association of PMD was stronger for women reporting a family history of breast cancer (OR1SD = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.67–3.04) than in women reporting none (OR1SD = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.24–1.60; pheterogeneity = 0.002). Similarly, effect modification by FHBC was observed using categories of PMD (pheterogeneity = 0.02) with respective ORs of 15.16 (95% CI, 4.23–54.28) vs. 3.14 (95% CI, 1.89–5.22) for ≥50% vs. <10% PMD. Conclusions The stronger association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk with a family history supports the hypothesis of shared genetic factors responsible for familial aggregation of breast cancer and the heritable component of mammographic density.

Tumor characteristics and family history in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: The French E3N cohort

Baglietto, Laura
Ultimo
2017

Abstract

Background Mammographic density is a known heritable risk factor for breast cancer, but reports how tumor characteristics and family history may modify this association are inconsistent. Methods Dense and total breast areas were assessed using Cumulus™ from pre-diagnostic mammograms for 820 invasive breast cancer cases and 820 matched controls nested within the French E3N cohort study. To allow comparisons across models, percent mammographic density (PMD) was standardized to the distribution of the controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of breast cancer risk for mammographic density were estimated by conditional logistic regression while adjusting for age and body mass index. Heterogeneity according to tumor characteristic and family history was assessed using stratified analyses. Results Overall, the OR per 1 SD for PMD was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.33–1.69). No evidence for significant heterogeneity by tumor size, lymph node status, grade, and hormone receptor status (estrogen, progesterone, and HER2) was detected. However, the association of PMD was stronger for women reporting a family history of breast cancer (OR1SD = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.67–3.04) than in women reporting none (OR1SD = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.24–1.60; pheterogeneity = 0.002). Similarly, effect modification by FHBC was observed using categories of PMD (pheterogeneity = 0.02) with respective ORs of 15.16 (95% CI, 4.23–54.28) vs. 3.14 (95% CI, 1.89–5.22) for ≥50% vs. <10% PMD. Conclusions The stronger association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk with a family history supports the hypothesis of shared genetic factors responsible for familial aggregation of breast cancer and the heritable component of mammographic density.
Maskarinec, Gertraud; Dartois, Laureen; Delaloge, Suzette; Hopper, John; Clavel-Chapelon, Franã§oise; Baglietto, Laura
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11568/897898
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact