Background: Improved understanding is needed of risk factors and markers of disease progression in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. We assessed associations between brain β-amyloidosis and various cognitive and neuroimaging parameters with progression of cognitive decline in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Methods: The INSIGHT-preAD is an ongoing single-centre observational study at the Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. Eligible participants were age 70–85 years with subjective memory complaints but unimpaired cognition and memory (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score ≥27, Clinical Dementia Rating score 0, and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test [FCSRT] total recall score ≥41). We stratified participants by brain amyloid β deposition on18F-florbetapir PET (positive or negative) at baseline. All patients underwent baseline assessments of demographic, cognitive, and psychobehavioural, characteristics, APOE ε4 allele carrier status, brain structure and function on MRI, brain glucose-metabolism on18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET, and event-related potentials on electroencephalograms (EEGs). Actigraphy and CSF investigations were optional. Participants were followed up with clinical, cognitive, and psychobehavioural assessments every 6 months, neuropsychological assessments, EEG, and actigraphy every 12 months, and MRI, and18F-FDG and18F-florbetapir PET every 24 months. We assessed associations of amyloid β deposition status with test outcomes at baseline and 24 months, and with clinical status at 30 months. Progression to prodromal Alzheimer's disease was defined as an amnestic syndrome of the hippocampal type. Findings: From May 25, 2013, to Jan 20, 2015, we enrolled 318 participants with a mean age of 76·0 years (SD 3·5). The mean baseline MMSE score was 28·67 (SD 0·96), and the mean level of education was high (score >6 [SD 2] on a scale of 1–8, where 1=infant school and 8=higher education). 88 (28%) of 318 participants showed amyloid β deposition and the remainder did not. The amyloid β subgroups did not differ for any psychobehavioural, cognitive, actigraphy, and structural and functional neuroimaging results after adjustment for age, sex, and level of education More participants positive for amyloid β deposition had the APOE ε4 allele (33 [38%] vs 29 [13%], p<0·0001). Amyloid β1–42concentration in CSF significantly correlated with mean18F-florbetapir uptake at baseline (r=–0·62, p<0·0001) and the ratio of amyloid β1–42to amyloid β1–40(r=–0·61, p<0·0001), and identified amyloid β deposition status with high accuracy (mean area under the curve values 0·89, 95% CI 0·80–0·98 and 0·84, 0·72–0·96, respectively). No difference was seen in MMSE (28·3 [SD 2·0] vs 28·9 [1·2], p=0·16) and Clinical Dementia Rating scores (0·06 [0·2] vs 0·05 [0·3]; p=0·79) at 30 months (n=274) between participants positive or negative for amyloid β. Four participants (all positive for amyloid β deposition at baseline) progressed to prodromal Alzheimer's disease. They were older than other participants positive for amyloid β deposition at baseline (mean 80·2 years [SD 4·1] vs 76·8 years [SD 3·4]) and had greater18F-florbetapir uptake at baseline (mean standard uptake value ratio 1·46 [SD 0·16] vs 1·02 [SD 0·20]), and more were carriers of the APOE ε4 allele (three [75%] of four vs 33 [39%] of 83). They also had mild executive dysfunction at baseline (mean FCSRT free recall score 21·25 [SD 2·75] vs 29·08 [5·44] and Frontal Assessment Battery total score 13·25 [1·50] vs 16·05 [1·68]). Interpretation: Brain β-amyloidosis alone did not predict progression to prodromal Alzheimer's disease within 30 months. Longer follow-up is needed to establish whether this finding remains consistent. Funding: Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire and Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière (IHU-A-ICM), Ministry of Research, Fondation Plan Alzheimer, Pfizer, and Avid.

Cognitive and neuroimaging features and brain β-amyloidosis in individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (INSIGHT-preAD): a longitudinal observational study

Baldacci, Filippo;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Improved understanding is needed of risk factors and markers of disease progression in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. We assessed associations between brain β-amyloidosis and various cognitive and neuroimaging parameters with progression of cognitive decline in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Methods: The INSIGHT-preAD is an ongoing single-centre observational study at the Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. Eligible participants were age 70–85 years with subjective memory complaints but unimpaired cognition and memory (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score ≥27, Clinical Dementia Rating score 0, and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test [FCSRT] total recall score ≥41). We stratified participants by brain amyloid β deposition on18F-florbetapir PET (positive or negative) at baseline. All patients underwent baseline assessments of demographic, cognitive, and psychobehavioural, characteristics, APOE ε4 allele carrier status, brain structure and function on MRI, brain glucose-metabolism on18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET, and event-related potentials on electroencephalograms (EEGs). Actigraphy and CSF investigations were optional. Participants were followed up with clinical, cognitive, and psychobehavioural assessments every 6 months, neuropsychological assessments, EEG, and actigraphy every 12 months, and MRI, and18F-FDG and18F-florbetapir PET every 24 months. We assessed associations of amyloid β deposition status with test outcomes at baseline and 24 months, and with clinical status at 30 months. Progression to prodromal Alzheimer's disease was defined as an amnestic syndrome of the hippocampal type. Findings: From May 25, 2013, to Jan 20, 2015, we enrolled 318 participants with a mean age of 76·0 years (SD 3·5). The mean baseline MMSE score was 28·67 (SD 0·96), and the mean level of education was high (score >6 [SD 2] on a scale of 1–8, where 1=infant school and 8=higher education). 88 (28%) of 318 participants showed amyloid β deposition and the remainder did not. The amyloid β subgroups did not differ for any psychobehavioural, cognitive, actigraphy, and structural and functional neuroimaging results after adjustment for age, sex, and level of education More participants positive for amyloid β deposition had the APOE ε4 allele (33 [38%] vs 29 [13%], p<0·0001). Amyloid β1–42concentration in CSF significantly correlated with mean18F-florbetapir uptake at baseline (r=–0·62, p<0·0001) and the ratio of amyloid β1–42to amyloid β1–40(r=–0·61, p<0·0001), and identified amyloid β deposition status with high accuracy (mean area under the curve values 0·89, 95% CI 0·80–0·98 and 0·84, 0·72–0·96, respectively). No difference was seen in MMSE (28·3 [SD 2·0] vs 28·9 [1·2], p=0·16) and Clinical Dementia Rating scores (0·06 [0·2] vs 0·05 [0·3]; p=0·79) at 30 months (n=274) between participants positive or negative for amyloid β. Four participants (all positive for amyloid β deposition at baseline) progressed to prodromal Alzheimer's disease. They were older than other participants positive for amyloid β deposition at baseline (mean 80·2 years [SD 4·1] vs 76·8 years [SD 3·4]) and had greater18F-florbetapir uptake at baseline (mean standard uptake value ratio 1·46 [SD 0·16] vs 1·02 [SD 0·20]), and more were carriers of the APOE ε4 allele (three [75%] of four vs 33 [39%] of 83). They also had mild executive dysfunction at baseline (mean FCSRT free recall score 21·25 [SD 2·75] vs 29·08 [5·44] and Frontal Assessment Battery total score 13·25 [1·50] vs 16·05 [1·68]). Interpretation: Brain β-amyloidosis alone did not predict progression to prodromal Alzheimer's disease within 30 months. Longer follow-up is needed to establish whether this finding remains consistent. Funding: Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire and Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière (IHU-A-ICM), Ministry of Research, Fondation Plan Alzheimer, Pfizer, and Avid.
2018
Dubois, Bruno; Epelbaum, Stephane; Nyasse, Francis; Bakardjian, Hovagim; Gagliardi, Geoffroy; Uspenskaya, Olga; Houot, Marion; Lista, Simone; Cacciamani, Federica; Potier, Marie-Claude; Bertrand, Anne; Lamari, Foudil; Benali, Habib; Mangin, Jean-François; Colliot, Olivier; Genthon, Remy; Habert, Marie-Odile; Hampel, Harald; Audrain, Christelle; Auffret, Alexandra; Baldacci, Filippo; Benakki, Ismahane; Bertin, Hugo; Boukadida, Laurie; Cavedo, Enrica; Chiesa, Patrizia; Dauphinot, Luce; Dos Santos, Antonio; Dubois, Marion; Durrleman, Stanley; Fontaine, Gaëlle; Genin, Alexis; Glasman, Pauline; Jungalee, Navichka; Kas, Aurélie; Kilani, Maya; La Corte, Valentina; Lehericy, Stephane; Letondor, Claire; Levy, Marcel; Lowrey, Mark; Ly, Juliette; Makiese, Ornella; Metzinger, Christiane; Michon, Agnès; Mochel, Fanny; Poisson, Catherine; Ratovohery, Stephie; Revillon, Marie; Rojkova, Katrine; Roy, Perrine; Santos-Andrade, Katia; Schindler, Rachel; Seux, Laure; Simon, Valérie; Sole, Marine; Tandetnik, Caroline; Teichmann, Marc; Thiebaut de Shotten, Michel; Younsi, Nadjia
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/917154
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 64
  • Scopus 147
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 138
social impact