Georg Simmel (1858-1918) and Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) belonged to two successive generations of thinkers and cultural critics who formulated their ideas on the urban crowd and worked internally and externally, respectively, to the “short century” (the twentieth century). Their points of view on the crowd as typical social forms of the modern metropolis represent two highly significant lines of thought in the history of the twentieth century, which at its beginning gave rise to hope in the proliferation and flowering of individuality, but later on deteriorated into the conventionalism of mass culture and the “colonization of consciousness” brought about by totalitarianism. The perspectives of these two thinkers on the question of the crowd would ‒ in the case of Simmel ‒ stem from a perspective before the crowd: a defense against the dangers that it represented for seventh-to-nineteenth-century individuality, whose dynamics are at the heart of his work, while Benjamin who, witnessing the impotence and inadequacy of the principium individuationis to withstand the reactionary regimes of the masses, would, in its waning, find hope – soon to be disappointed – for a new era of the masses and an ill-defined “new collective body” beyond the crowd.
Before and Beyond the Masses. Simmel, Benjamin, and the Sociology of Crowds
Vincenzo MelePrimo
2018-01-01
Abstract
Georg Simmel (1858-1918) and Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) belonged to two successive generations of thinkers and cultural critics who formulated their ideas on the urban crowd and worked internally and externally, respectively, to the “short century” (the twentieth century). Their points of view on the crowd as typical social forms of the modern metropolis represent two highly significant lines of thought in the history of the twentieth century, which at its beginning gave rise to hope in the proliferation and flowering of individuality, but later on deteriorated into the conventionalism of mass culture and the “colonization of consciousness” brought about by totalitarianism. The perspectives of these two thinkers on the question of the crowd would ‒ in the case of Simmel ‒ stem from a perspective before the crowd: a defense against the dangers that it represented for seventh-to-nineteenth-century individuality, whose dynamics are at the heart of his work, while Benjamin who, witnessing the impotence and inadequacy of the principium individuationis to withstand the reactionary regimes of the masses, would, in its waning, find hope – soon to be disappointed – for a new era of the masses and an ill-defined “new collective body” beyond the crowd.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MELE Article.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
239.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
239.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.