Georg Simmel (1858-1918) and Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) belonged to two successive generations of thinkers and cultural critics who formulated their ideas on the urban crowd and worked internally and externally, respectively, to the “short century” (the twentieth century). Their points of view on the crowd as typical social forms of the modern metropolis represent two highly significant lines of thought in the history of the twentieth century, which at its beginning gave rise to hope in the proliferation and flowering of individuality, but later on deteriorated into the conventionalism of mass culture and the “colonization of consciousness” brought about by totalitarianism. The perspectives of these two thinkers on the question of the crowd would ‒ in the case of Simmel ‒ stem from a perspective before the crowd: a defense against the dangers that it represented for seventh-to-nineteenth-century individuality, whose dynamics are at the heart of his work, while Benjamin who, witnessing the impotence and inadequacy of the principium individuationis to withstand the reactionary regimes of the masses, would, in its waning, find hope – soon to be disappointed – for a new era of the masses and an ill-defined “new collective body” beyond the crowd.

Before and Beyond the Masses. Simmel, Benjamin, and the Sociology of Crowds

Vincenzo Mele
Primo
2018-01-01

Abstract

Georg Simmel (1858-1918) and Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) belonged to two successive generations of thinkers and cultural critics who formulated their ideas on the urban crowd and worked internally and externally, respectively, to the “short century” (the twentieth century). Their points of view on the crowd as typical social forms of the modern metropolis represent two highly significant lines of thought in the history of the twentieth century, which at its beginning gave rise to hope in the proliferation and flowering of individuality, but later on deteriorated into the conventionalism of mass culture and the “colonization of consciousness” brought about by totalitarianism. The perspectives of these two thinkers on the question of the crowd would ‒ in the case of Simmel ‒ stem from a perspective before the crowd: a defense against the dangers that it represented for seventh-to-nineteenth-century individuality, whose dynamics are at the heart of his work, while Benjamin who, witnessing the impotence and inadequacy of the principium individuationis to withstand the reactionary regimes of the masses, would, in its waning, find hope – soon to be disappointed – for a new era of the masses and an ill-defined “new collective body” beyond the crowd.
2018
Mele, Vincenzo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MELE Article.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 239.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
239.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/920039
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact