Objective: The goal of this study is to demonstrate the need for interdisciplinary consensus and inclusion of mummy radiology specialists in analyses of mummified remains. Materials: This study uses paleoimaging data for an ancient Egyptian mummy at the Museum of Human Anatomy “Filippo Civinini”. Methods: This study demonstrates the benefit of evaluation of mummified remains in a multi-disciplinary interpretive team. Results: The authors propose a diagnosis of DISH, additional signs of undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, and lumbarisation of S1. Conclusions: The process of diagnosis by consensus is essential to the analysis of mummified remains, which are complexly altered through natural and anthropogenic processes in the millennia subsequent to the individual’s death. Significance: Mummy paleoimaging and paleopathology lacks a unifying set of standards. We present an example of the value to be found in the multi-disciplinary diagnosis by consensus approach. Limitations: We discuss numerous challenges to accurate and meaningful interpretation that radiography of mummified remains pose. Suggestions for Further Research: While the authors do not seek to impose any single set of standards, we do recommend a larger discussion on the topic of (culture-specific) standardisation in mummy paleoimaging and paleopathology. We further recommend the development of an international, multi-disciplinary panel of paleoimaging interpreters.

Diagnosis by consensus: A case study in the importance of interdisciplinary interpretation of mummified remains.

Natale G;Caramella D;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to demonstrate the need for interdisciplinary consensus and inclusion of mummy radiology specialists in analyses of mummified remains. Materials: This study uses paleoimaging data for an ancient Egyptian mummy at the Museum of Human Anatomy “Filippo Civinini”. Methods: This study demonstrates the benefit of evaluation of mummified remains in a multi-disciplinary interpretive team. Results: The authors propose a diagnosis of DISH, additional signs of undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, and lumbarisation of S1. Conclusions: The process of diagnosis by consensus is essential to the analysis of mummified remains, which are complexly altered through natural and anthropogenic processes in the millennia subsequent to the individual’s death. Significance: Mummy paleoimaging and paleopathology lacks a unifying set of standards. We present an example of the value to be found in the multi-disciplinary diagnosis by consensus approach. Limitations: We discuss numerous challenges to accurate and meaningful interpretation that radiography of mummified remains pose. Suggestions for Further Research: While the authors do not seek to impose any single set of standards, we do recommend a larger discussion on the topic of (culture-specific) standardisation in mummy paleoimaging and paleopathology. We further recommend the development of an international, multi-disciplinary panel of paleoimaging interpreters.
2019
Wade, Ad; Beckett, R; Conlogue, G; Garvin, G; Saleem, S; Natale, G; Caramella, D; Nelson, A.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/934327
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact