The Chartreuse in Calci is a IV century monument, home to the National Museum of the Chartreuse and the Natural History and Territory Museum. In the last years it has been suffering a sharp deterioration that requires an urgent functional and architectonic recovery. The question is to find a functional solution: scientifically proved; supporting the interests of the different stakeholders. Moreover, the presence of two managers, makes decisions difficult; respecting of the unique history vocations and the complex territorial context; economically efficient. A Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making (MCDM) method is applied to establish scientifically the most suitable solution among discrete alternatives. It is necessary to choose the parameters of the MCDM procedure - Objectives, Stakeholders, Alternatives and Criteria - by studying the results of the historical, urban and current state analysis. We identify 3 feasible alternatives: Museum Centre, Multifunctional Centre, and Convention Centre. They are evaluated through Criteria, which must ensure that all aspects that differentiate them are investigated and that Objectives are respected. Criteria are gathered into quantitative and qualitative ones, then weighed by the stakeholders in relation to their personal interests; lastly, we obtain an emerging solution for each stakeholder deriving by a scientific procedure. Although Multifunctional Centre is the solution that more rationally follows the objectives, and which achieves the greatest consensus among stakeholders, MCDM allows to elaborate smarter solutions by completing the winner one with some of the interesting characteristics adopted in the other alternatives.
The chartreuse in Calci. Application of a multi criteria decision making method (MCDM) to its functional recovery
EWA JOLANTA KARWACKA;LUISA SANTINI
;ITALIA, DENISE
2018-01-01
Abstract
The Chartreuse in Calci is a IV century monument, home to the National Museum of the Chartreuse and the Natural History and Territory Museum. In the last years it has been suffering a sharp deterioration that requires an urgent functional and architectonic recovery. The question is to find a functional solution: scientifically proved; supporting the interests of the different stakeholders. Moreover, the presence of two managers, makes decisions difficult; respecting of the unique history vocations and the complex territorial context; economically efficient. A Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making (MCDM) method is applied to establish scientifically the most suitable solution among discrete alternatives. It is necessary to choose the parameters of the MCDM procedure - Objectives, Stakeholders, Alternatives and Criteria - by studying the results of the historical, urban and current state analysis. We identify 3 feasible alternatives: Museum Centre, Multifunctional Centre, and Convention Centre. They are evaluated through Criteria, which must ensure that all aspects that differentiate them are investigated and that Objectives are respected. Criteria are gathered into quantitative and qualitative ones, then weighed by the stakeholders in relation to their personal interests; lastly, we obtain an emerging solution for each stakeholder deriving by a scientific procedure. Although Multifunctional Centre is the solution that more rationally follows the objectives, and which achieves the greatest consensus among stakeholders, MCDM allows to elaborate smarter solutions by completing the winner one with some of the interesting characteristics adopted in the other alternatives.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
