OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) receiving intramuscular methotrexate 50 mg total dose/day versus 1 mg/kg/day in a 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) regimen. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included 176 patients: 99 (56%) receiving methotrexate 50 mg total dose/day on days 1, 3, 5, 7 alternated with FA 7,5 mg on days 2, 4, 6, 8, every 14 days (group A); and 77 patients (44%), receiving methotrexate 1 mg/kg/day on days 1, 3, 5, 7 alternated with FA 7,5 mg on days 2, 4, 6, 8, every 14 days (group B). Patients' characteristics and outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (25.6%) developed resistance to MTX and received a second-line treatment, 7 (4%) received a third-line treatment and 8 (4.5%) relapsed after initial remission. There was no difference between group A and B patients in the average number of chemotherapy cycles required to achieve remission (5.7 ± 2.6 vs 6.3 ± 2.3, p = 0.106). The 2 treatment groups showed comparable rates of MTX resistance (28.3% vs 22.1%, p = 0.387) and relapse (3% vs 6.5%, p = 0.300). There was no difference in the incidence of treatment toxicity of any CTCAE grade between group A and B patients (16.2% vs 15.2%, p = 0.999). Subgroup analysis stratifying patients by weight (<50 kg, ≥60 kg, ≥70 kg, ≥80 kg) confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: The 2 MTX schedules showed comparable efficacy in the treatment of low-risk GTN with an acceptable rate of toxicity

Does methotrexate (MTX) dosing in a 8-day MTX/FA regimen for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia affect outcomes? The MITO-9 study.

Angiolo Gadducci;
2018-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) receiving intramuscular methotrexate 50 mg total dose/day versus 1 mg/kg/day in a 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) regimen. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included 176 patients: 99 (56%) receiving methotrexate 50 mg total dose/day on days 1, 3, 5, 7 alternated with FA 7,5 mg on days 2, 4, 6, 8, every 14 days (group A); and 77 patients (44%), receiving methotrexate 1 mg/kg/day on days 1, 3, 5, 7 alternated with FA 7,5 mg on days 2, 4, 6, 8, every 14 days (group B). Patients' characteristics and outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (25.6%) developed resistance to MTX and received a second-line treatment, 7 (4%) received a third-line treatment and 8 (4.5%) relapsed after initial remission. There was no difference between group A and B patients in the average number of chemotherapy cycles required to achieve remission (5.7 ± 2.6 vs 6.3 ± 2.3, p = 0.106). The 2 treatment groups showed comparable rates of MTX resistance (28.3% vs 22.1%, p = 0.387) and relapse (3% vs 6.5%, p = 0.300). There was no difference in the incidence of treatment toxicity of any CTCAE grade between group A and B patients (16.2% vs 15.2%, p = 0.999). Subgroup analysis stratifying patients by weight (<50 kg, ≥60 kg, ≥70 kg, ≥80 kg) confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: The 2 MTX schedules showed comparable efficacy in the treatment of low-risk GTN with an acceptable rate of toxicity
2018
G1, Mangili; R2, Cioffi; S3, Danese; L4, Frigerio; G5, Ferrandina; G6, Cormio; E1, Rabaiotti; G7, Scarfone; Gadducci, Angiolo; A1, Bergamini; C9, Pisa...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/948095
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact