The essay deals with textual and interpretative problems of Michelangelo’s poetry; in particular, it deals with the problem that his manuscripts nearly always bear the signs of an unfinished process of development. A historical and stylistic analysis shows that editors of the Rime have hardly ever accepted the ‘unfinished’ as a peculiar characteristic of Buonarroti’s writing. Even the important critical edition by Enzo Noè Girardi includes some limitations and could be improved. The author provides a new edition of sonnet 58, which is an exemplary case of an unfinished poem, in that it becomes possible to read only after a reconstruction of scattered autographed fragments. in the second part of the essay, the author proposes an interpretation and a date of composition of one version of madrigal 246. In both of the poems examined one may trace expressions that are connected in various ways with artistic language: by making internal comparisons within the corpus as well as comparisons to other poets, determinations are sought regarding the genesis, style and significance of such language.
Altri spunti per una filologia del non-finito e per il linguaggio dell'arte: il sonetto 58 di Michelangelo (e alcune proposte per il madrigale 246)
Ida Campeggiani
2017-01-01
Abstract
The essay deals with textual and interpretative problems of Michelangelo’s poetry; in particular, it deals with the problem that his manuscripts nearly always bear the signs of an unfinished process of development. A historical and stylistic analysis shows that editors of the Rime have hardly ever accepted the ‘unfinished’ as a peculiar characteristic of Buonarroti’s writing. Even the important critical edition by Enzo Noè Girardi includes some limitations and could be improved. The author provides a new edition of sonnet 58, which is an exemplary case of an unfinished poem, in that it becomes possible to read only after a reconstruction of scattered autographed fragments. in the second part of the essay, the author proposes an interpretation and a date of composition of one version of madrigal 246. In both of the poems examined one may trace expressions that are connected in various ways with artistic language: by making internal comparisons within the corpus as well as comparisons to other poets, determinations are sought regarding the genesis, style and significance of such language.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Campeggiani Michelangelo non finito.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.86 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.