The term laterality refers to the preference most mammals show for one body side over the other. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the First-stepping test (Tomkins et al., 2010) in relation to the familiarity with the handler. Thirty-eight adult dogs (22 females, 16 males, different breeds) were tested twice in a modified version of Tomkins’ test (30 repetitions instead of 50), once with the owner and once with an unfamiliar handler, one day apart. The paw preference (PP) for each dog in both tests was determined as suggested by Tomkins et al. (2010), calculating the lateralization index and considering a significant preference for Z-scores < − 1.96 (left PP) or > + 1.96 (right PP). There was a low concordance between the Z-scores of the two tests (Cohens’ Kappa coefficient = 0.44). In detail, the Z-score of 14 dogs was different in relation to the familiarity with the handler: 1 dog showed a right PP with the owner and a left PP with the unfamiliar handler; 9 dogs showed a non-significant Z-score with the owner and a significant Z-score with the unfamiliar handler; 4 dogs showed a significant Z-score with the owner and a non-significant Z-score with the unfamiliar handler. Previous literature on dogs and other mammals reports that laterality is strongly task-dependent. The current findings suggest that PP may be influenced by other factors, such as the familiarity with the handler, which should be taken into account when testing animals for motor laterality.

Motor laterality in domestic dogs: does the familiarity with the handler influence the paw preference?

A. Ogi
Primo
;
FORTUNATO, DONATO;G. Guardini;C. Mariti
Penultimo
;
A. Gazzano
Ultimo
2016-01-01

Abstract

The term laterality refers to the preference most mammals show for one body side over the other. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the First-stepping test (Tomkins et al., 2010) in relation to the familiarity with the handler. Thirty-eight adult dogs (22 females, 16 males, different breeds) were tested twice in a modified version of Tomkins’ test (30 repetitions instead of 50), once with the owner and once with an unfamiliar handler, one day apart. The paw preference (PP) for each dog in both tests was determined as suggested by Tomkins et al. (2010), calculating the lateralization index and considering a significant preference for Z-scores < − 1.96 (left PP) or > + 1.96 (right PP). There was a low concordance between the Z-scores of the two tests (Cohens’ Kappa coefficient = 0.44). In detail, the Z-score of 14 dogs was different in relation to the familiarity with the handler: 1 dog showed a right PP with the owner and a left PP with the unfamiliar handler; 9 dogs showed a non-significant Z-score with the owner and a significant Z-score with the unfamiliar handler; 4 dogs showed a significant Z-score with the owner and a non-significant Z-score with the unfamiliar handler. Previous literature on dogs and other mammals reports that laterality is strongly task-dependent. The current findings suggest that PP may be influenced by other factors, such as the familiarity with the handler, which should be taken into account when testing animals for motor laterality.
2016
https://www.dogbehavior.it/index.php?journal=dogbehavior&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=44&path%5B%5D=34
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/955575
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact