Ultrasound is the most commonly used liver imaging modality worldwide. Unfortunately, ultrasound has limited sensitivity in the detection of small tumour nodules. Moreover, ultrasound findings are often non-specific, as there is enough variability and overlap in the appearance of benign and malignant liver lesions to make a definite distinction problematic. Recently, the introduction of microbubble contrast agents and the development of contrast-specific techniques have opened new prospects in liver ultrasound. The advent of second-generation agents that have higher harmonic emission capabilities has been instrumental in improving the easiness and the reproducibility of the examination. Over the past few years, several reports have shown that real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound can substantially improve detection and characterization of focal liver lesions with respect to baseline studies. With the publication of the guidelines for the use of contrast agents in liver ultrasound by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB), contrast-enhanced ultrasound has entered clinical practice. The guidelines define the indications and recommendations for the use of contrast agents in focal liver lesion detection, characterization and posttreatment follow-up. In this paper, we discuss the impact of EFSUMB guidelines on diagnostic protocols currently adopted in liver imaging with regard to four clinical scenarios: (1) characterization of focal liver lesions of incidental detection; (2) diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis; (3) detection of hepatic metastases in oncology patients; (4) guidance and assessment of the outcome of percutaneous tumour ablation procedures

European federation of societies for ultrasound in medicine and biology (EFSUMB) guidelines for the use of contrast agents in liver ultrasound: what is the impact in clinical practice?

LENCIONI, RICCARDO ANTONIO
2005-01-01

Abstract

Ultrasound is the most commonly used liver imaging modality worldwide. Unfortunately, ultrasound has limited sensitivity in the detection of small tumour nodules. Moreover, ultrasound findings are often non-specific, as there is enough variability and overlap in the appearance of benign and malignant liver lesions to make a definite distinction problematic. Recently, the introduction of microbubble contrast agents and the development of contrast-specific techniques have opened new prospects in liver ultrasound. The advent of second-generation agents that have higher harmonic emission capabilities has been instrumental in improving the easiness and the reproducibility of the examination. Over the past few years, several reports have shown that real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound can substantially improve detection and characterization of focal liver lesions with respect to baseline studies. With the publication of the guidelines for the use of contrast agents in liver ultrasound by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB), contrast-enhanced ultrasound has entered clinical practice. The guidelines define the indications and recommendations for the use of contrast agents in focal liver lesion detection, characterization and posttreatment follow-up. In this paper, we discuss the impact of EFSUMB guidelines on diagnostic protocols currently adopted in liver imaging with regard to four clinical scenarios: (1) characterization of focal liver lesions of incidental detection; (2) diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis; (3) detection of hepatic metastases in oncology patients; (4) guidance and assessment of the outcome of percutaneous tumour ablation procedures
2005
Lencioni, RICCARDO ANTONIO
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/99635
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact