Abstract: In this review of Giorgio Agamben’s Homo sacer. Edizione integrale.1995-2015, the main theme is the critique of the philosophical method used by the Italian philosopher. The method is called “philosophical archaeology”. It could be considered a particular research finalized to demonstrate the structure of western politics as a “double machine”: animal life – the Aristotelian zoe – in the origin of the western political and metaphysical thought is excluded and included in polis at the same time, a kind of hidden foundation opposed and linked with political life – the Aristotelian bios. In this review are analyzed new possible horizons opened thanks to this method, but also its aporias and contradictions.
Per una critica dell'archeologia filosofica. Nota a Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer
Andrea Raciti
2019-01-01
Abstract
Abstract: In this review of Giorgio Agamben’s Homo sacer. Edizione integrale.1995-2015, the main theme is the critique of the philosophical method used by the Italian philosopher. The method is called “philosophical archaeology”. It could be considered a particular research finalized to demonstrate the structure of western politics as a “double machine”: animal life – the Aristotelian zoe – in the origin of the western political and metaphysical thought is excluded and included in polis at the same time, a kind of hidden foundation opposed and linked with political life – the Aristotelian bios. In this review are analyzed new possible horizons opened thanks to this method, but also its aporias and contradictions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nota a Homo Sacer- Per una critica dell'archeologia filosofica.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
7.09 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.09 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
