Undoubtedly, the use of a substitution-paradigm to interpret the mechanism of signification has been characteristic of many cultural traditions over the centuries. Rarely, however, has it taken on the dimensions that we recognize in the late-Vedic period, in which it stands as a global heuristic paradigm that permeates the whole creation and transmission of culture in the Indian sub-continent. The article questions the role of this cultural specific back- ground in the development of metalinguistic thought. Three crucial steps are taken into account, namely the grammarians and philosophers Pāṇini (ca V/ IV BC), Patañjali (II BC) and Bhartṛhari (V AD). The crucial role of the sub- stitution-frame emerges quite clearly in the paradigmatic shift between the two authors, the first still thinking within a substitution frame while the latter reasons in a compositional one. Bhartṛhari, on the other hand, proves, also on this subject, that he is a brilliant restorer of the late-Vedic linguistic thought; an element that should be taken more into account in the global interpretation of this great philosopher.
METALANGUAGE AND SUBSTITUTION IN LATE-VEDIC LINGUISTIC THOUGHT
Maria Piera Candotti
2021-01-01
Abstract
Undoubtedly, the use of a substitution-paradigm to interpret the mechanism of signification has been characteristic of many cultural traditions over the centuries. Rarely, however, has it taken on the dimensions that we recognize in the late-Vedic period, in which it stands as a global heuristic paradigm that permeates the whole creation and transmission of culture in the Indian sub-continent. The article questions the role of this cultural specific back- ground in the development of metalinguistic thought. Three crucial steps are taken into account, namely the grammarians and philosophers Pāṇini (ca V/ IV BC), Patañjali (II BC) and Bhartṛhari (V AD). The crucial role of the sub- stitution-frame emerges quite clearly in the paradigmatic shift between the two authors, the first still thinking within a substitution frame while the latter reasons in a compositional one. Bhartṛhari, on the other hand, proves, also on this subject, that he is a brilliant restorer of the late-Vedic linguistic thought; an element that should be taken more into account in the global interpretation of this great philosopher.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
