We discuss the construction of low-energy tight-binding Hamiltonians for condensed-matter systems with a strong coupling to the quantum electromagnetic field. Such Hamiltonians can be obtained by projecting the continuum theory on a given set of Wannier orbitals. However, different representations of the continuum theory lead to different low-energy formulations because different representations may entangle light and matter, transforming orbitals into light-matter hybrid states before the projection. In particular, a multicenter Power-Zienau-Woolley transformation yields a dipolar Hamiltonian which incorporates the light-matter coupling via both Peierls phases and a polarization density. We compare this dipolar gauge Hamiltonian and the straightforward Coulomb gauge Hamiltonian for a one-dimensional solid to describe subcycle light-driven electronic motion in the semiclassical limit and a coupling of the solid to a quantized cavity mode which renormalizes the band-structure into electron-polariton bands. Both descriptions yield the same result when many bands are taken into account but the dipolar Hamiltonian is more accurate when the model is restricted to few electronic bands, while the Coulomb Hamiltonian requires fewer electromagnetic modes.
Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter
Mazza, Giacomo;
2020-01-01
Abstract
We discuss the construction of low-energy tight-binding Hamiltonians for condensed-matter systems with a strong coupling to the quantum electromagnetic field. Such Hamiltonians can be obtained by projecting the continuum theory on a given set of Wannier orbitals. However, different representations of the continuum theory lead to different low-energy formulations because different representations may entangle light and matter, transforming orbitals into light-matter hybrid states before the projection. In particular, a multicenter Power-Zienau-Woolley transformation yields a dipolar Hamiltonian which incorporates the light-matter coupling via both Peierls phases and a polarization density. We compare this dipolar gauge Hamiltonian and the straightforward Coulomb gauge Hamiltonian for a one-dimensional solid to describe subcycle light-driven electronic motion in the semiclassical limit and a coupling of the solid to a quantized cavity mode which renormalizes the band-structure into electron-polariton bands. Both descriptions yield the same result when many bands are taken into account but the dipolar Hamiltonian is more accurate when the model is restricted to few electronic bands, while the Coulomb Hamiltonian requires fewer electromagnetic modes.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JL_DG_GM_AJM_AG_ME_tight_binding_2020.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
901.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
901.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
2001.09726v2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.13 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.