In this paper we argue that squeezing arguments à la Kreisel fail to univocally capture an informal or intuitive notion of validity. This suggests a form of logical pluralism, at a conceptual level, not only among but also within logical systems.
Squeezing arguments and the plurality of informal notions
Venturi G
2021-01-01
Abstract
In this paper we argue that squeezing arguments à la Kreisel fail to univocally capture an informal or intuitive notion of validity. This suggests a form of logical pluralism, at a conceptual level, not only among but also within logical systems.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Squeezing arguments and informal notions.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
573.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
573.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
